<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: I've found my optimum categorical level; how do I drop the rest during design augmentation? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/I-ve-found-my-optimum-categorical-level-how-do-I-drop-the-rest/m-p/621649#M82069</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/47497"&gt;@Brian_Pimentel&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Welcome in the Community !&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;May I ask you more details about the goal of your study (optimization/prediction, explanation, both ? ...), the number of factors, the number of runs, design and results you already have ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It looks like you're doing a DoE to "pick a winner", for example to choose the best level in the 3-levels categorical factor. But is this factor significant in the analysis of main effects ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If yes, I would highly recommend to augment your design, keep using this categorical factor and look at 2-factors interactions. You may have some significant interactions between this categorical factor and other factors, so level B may not be always the optimal choice in presence of interactions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If no, you may simply augment your design (in menu "DoE", "Augment Design") without using this factor in the augmentation panel. As an example, I used the JMP dataset "Algorithm Data" and augment the design on all factors except the 3-levels categorical factor "Algorithm" :&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Victor_G_0-1681198065319.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/51876i85AE15E636B4D806/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Victor_G_0-1681198065319.png" alt="Victor_G_0-1681198065319.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Algorithm won't be a factor anymore in my design, so I can simply set the level of this factor and enter the level chosen in the corresponding column.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No matter how you're doing the augmentation (with or without the 3-levels categorical factor), I would also recommend to check the option "Group new runs into separate block". More info about the "Augment Design" platform is available here :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/17.1/#page/jmp/augment-designs.shtml#" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Augment Designs (jmp.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this answer will help you,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:13:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Victor_G</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-11T08:13:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>I've found my optimum categorical level; how do I drop the rest during design augmentation?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/I-ve-found-my-optimum-categorical-level-how-do-I-drop-the-rest/m-p/621566#M82062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Let's say I've designed my initial main effect screening experiment, where one of the factors is a 3-level categorical (A, B, C).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After the first set of experiments, I'm fairly certain that level B is my process optimum decision and want to augment the design to get two-factor interactions, etc. How do I restrict the design augmentation to only explore the B level? Using "Hide and Exclude" leads to a big loss of information for the other factors, which I'd like to avoid.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 21:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/I-ve-found-my-optimum-categorical-level-how-do-I-drop-the-rest/m-p/621566#M82062</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian_Pimentel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-08T21:14:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: I've found my optimum categorical level; how do I drop the rest during design augmentation?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/I-ve-found-my-optimum-categorical-level-how-do-I-drop-the-rest/m-p/621649#M82069</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/47497"&gt;@Brian_Pimentel&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Welcome in the Community !&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;May I ask you more details about the goal of your study (optimization/prediction, explanation, both ? ...), the number of factors, the number of runs, design and results you already have ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It looks like you're doing a DoE to "pick a winner", for example to choose the best level in the 3-levels categorical factor. But is this factor significant in the analysis of main effects ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If yes, I would highly recommend to augment your design, keep using this categorical factor and look at 2-factors interactions. You may have some significant interactions between this categorical factor and other factors, so level B may not be always the optimal choice in presence of interactions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;If no, you may simply augment your design (in menu "DoE", "Augment Design") without using this factor in the augmentation panel. As an example, I used the JMP dataset "Algorithm Data" and augment the design on all factors except the 3-levels categorical factor "Algorithm" :&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Victor_G_0-1681198065319.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/51876i85AE15E636B4D806/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Victor_G_0-1681198065319.png" alt="Victor_G_0-1681198065319.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Algorithm won't be a factor anymore in my design, so I can simply set the level of this factor and enter the level chosen in the corresponding column.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No matter how you're doing the augmentation (with or without the 3-levels categorical factor), I would also recommend to check the option "Group new runs into separate block". More info about the "Augment Design" platform is available here :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/17.1/#page/jmp/augment-designs.shtml#" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Augment Designs (jmp.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this answer will help you,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 08:13:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/I-ve-found-my-optimum-categorical-level-how-do-I-drop-the-rest/m-p/621649#M82069</guid>
      <dc:creator>Victor_G</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-11T08:13:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

