<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic JMP &amp;gt; Proportional Hazard with Continuous parameter &amp;gt; Cutoff Optimization in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Proportional-Hazard-with-Continuous-parameter-gt-Cutoff/m-p/613826#M81391</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi JMP Community,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;JMP 16.1 Standard&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Windows&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This might be a naive question. I am exploring the impact of a continuous baseline variable on the survival of subjects using the Proportional Hazard platform. I identified some factors with strong associations (see one example below), but I am still determining how to visualize this relationship.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Thierry_S_1-1679098626513.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/51227i3110296768DB4594/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Thierry_S_1-1679098626513.png" alt="Thierry_S_1-1679098626513.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example, I can create a survival plot if I create arbitrary sub-groups using the median as cutoff point (see below). However, this approach does not take into account the actual optimal cutoff point of the continuous variable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Thierry_S_0-1679098485732.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/51228iC47BC643F1CA39AC/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Thierry_S_0-1679098485732.png" alt="Thierry_S_0-1679098485732.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hence, I am looking for an approach to estimate this cutoff point for all identified parameters. Beside a brute-force bootstrap approach (cycling through likely cutoffs), I could not find a more elegant approach to this apparent simple problem (Yes, I read the documentation for the platform).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any input would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please, feel free to let me know if my question is misguided.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TS&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 16:27:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Thierry_S</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-08T16:27:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>JMP &gt; Proportional Hazard with Continuous parameter &gt; Cutoff Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Proportional-Hazard-with-Continuous-parameter-gt-Cutoff/m-p/613826#M81391</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi JMP Community,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;JMP 16.1 Standard&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Windows&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This might be a naive question. I am exploring the impact of a continuous baseline variable on the survival of subjects using the Proportional Hazard platform. I identified some factors with strong associations (see one example below), but I am still determining how to visualize this relationship.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Thierry_S_1-1679098626513.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/51227i3110296768DB4594/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Thierry_S_1-1679098626513.png" alt="Thierry_S_1-1679098626513.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example, I can create a survival plot if I create arbitrary sub-groups using the median as cutoff point (see below). However, this approach does not take into account the actual optimal cutoff point of the continuous variable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Thierry_S_0-1679098485732.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/51228iC47BC643F1CA39AC/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Thierry_S_0-1679098485732.png" alt="Thierry_S_0-1679098485732.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hence, I am looking for an approach to estimate this cutoff point for all identified parameters. Beside a brute-force bootstrap approach (cycling through likely cutoffs), I could not find a more elegant approach to this apparent simple problem (Yes, I read the documentation for the platform).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any input would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please, feel free to let me know if my question is misguided.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TS&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 16:27:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Proportional-Hazard-with-Continuous-parameter-gt-Cutoff/m-p/613826#M81391</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thierry_S</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-08T16:27:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JMP &gt; Proportional Hazard with Continuous parameter &gt; Cutoff Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Proportional-Hazard-with-Continuous-parameter-gt-Cutoff/m-p/614224#M81424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you considered a profiler on the fitted model? I see that the Proportional Hazard platform cannot save a prediction formula, and it does not provide a profiler either. Can you use the Parametric Survival platform? If so, it provides both features.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:29:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Proportional-Hazard-with-Continuous-parameter-gt-Cutoff/m-p/614224#M81424</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-20T14:29:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JMP &gt; Proportional Hazard with Continuous parameter &gt; Cutoff Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Proportional-Hazard-with-Continuous-parameter-gt-Cutoff/m-p/614313#M81432</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I support the proposal by Mark as I use this proceding very often by myself. At this occasion I would appreciate if the Parametric Survival Platform of JMP would provide risk ratios in addition as the majority of parametric survival functions implemented fulfil the proportional hazards assumption.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Winfried&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:33:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Proportional-Hazard-with-Continuous-parameter-gt-Cutoff/m-p/614313#M81432</guid>
      <dc:creator>winfriedkoch0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-20T17:33:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JMP &gt; Proportional Hazard with Continuous parameter &gt; Cutoff Optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Proportional-Hazard-with-Continuous-parameter-gt-Cutoff/m-p/614739#M81461</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi JMP Team,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I decided to adopt the brute-force approach by developing a short script that iterates in 50 steps&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;through a range of cutoffs between the 25th and 75th percentiles of the variable on interest. For each cutoff, I run the Proportional Hazard platform on the dichotomized variable of interest, recording the test performance. The optimized cutoff is then set to the value that maximizes the test performance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;TS&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Proportional-Hazard-with-Continuous-parameter-gt-Cutoff/m-p/614739#M81461</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thierry_S</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-21T13:50:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

