<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Post-hoc subgroup Analysis in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Post-hoc-subgroup-Analysis/m-p/608459#M80991</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey everyone,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I got a question concerning the post-hoc analysis, here's the context:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I got 4 medicaments (A, B, C, D) and 3 major diagnosis (Dx1, Dx2, Dx3). I used fit y (3 Diagnoses) by x (the medicaments) to view how each medicament is distributed to the 3 diagnoses. According to Pearsons, there is a significant difference. I wanted to identify the exact difference by using a post-hoc subgroup analysis but I couldn't really figure out how.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate any help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 16:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kazmo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-08T16:31:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Post-hoc subgroup Analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Post-hoc-subgroup-Analysis/m-p/608459#M80991</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey everyone,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I got a question concerning the post-hoc analysis, here's the context:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I got 4 medicaments (A, B, C, D) and 3 major diagnosis (Dx1, Dx2, Dx3). I used fit y (3 Diagnoses) by x (the medicaments) to view how each medicament is distributed to the 3 diagnoses. According to Pearsons, there is a significant difference. I wanted to identify the exact difference by using a post-hoc subgroup analysis but I couldn't really figure out how.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate any help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 16:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Post-hoc-subgroup-Analysis/m-p/608459#M80991</guid>
      <dc:creator>kazmo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-08T16:31:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Post-hoc subgroup Analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Post-hoc-subgroup-Analysis/m-p/608636#M81008</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are no post hoc tests in the Contingency or Nominal Logistic platforms. The Generalized Regression platform red triangle menu has a Multiple Comparisons command. This platform is a JMP Pro feature.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 18:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Post-hoc-subgroup-Analysis/m-p/608636#M81008</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-06T18:20:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

