<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: D efficiency in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/7883#M7877</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P class="page" title="Page 8"&gt;The measures of efficiency are scaled between 0 to 100&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="column"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="column"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The efficiency is a measure of the goodness of a design relative to a hypothetical orthogonal design so they are not useful as absolute measures. They should be used in a relative fashion to compare one design to another. Efficiencies that are less than 100 may be perfectly satisfactory.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="column"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 23:09:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>louv</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-19T23:09:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>D efficiency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/7882#M7876</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am new to JMP. In DOE, what is the significance of D efficiency and I efficiency. When I make a custom design model, should the D efficiency be under or over certain value for my design to be useful? In a model I made my D-efficiency is 74 % what does this mean? My design is good/bad/okay?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 22:47:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/7882#M7876</guid>
      <dc:creator>parag</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-19T22:47:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: D efficiency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/7883#M7877</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P class="page" title="Page 8"&gt;The measures of efficiency are scaled between 0 to 100&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="column"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="column"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The efficiency is a measure of the goodness of a design relative to a hypothetical orthogonal design so they are not useful as absolute measures. They should be used in a relative fashion to compare one design to another. Efficiencies that are less than 100 may be perfectly satisfactory.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="column"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 23:09:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/7883#M7877</guid>
      <dc:creator>louv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-19T23:09:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: D efficiency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/7884#M7878</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A great book on this topic is titled Optimal Design of Experiments by Peter Goos and Bradley Jones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A key quote from the book with regard to this topic is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"do not recommend focusing on D-efficiency...we find it useful to compute relative D-efficiencies to compare competing designs"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 23:30:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/7884#M7878</guid>
      <dc:creator>louv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-19T23:30:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: D efficiency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/7885#M7879</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot LouV. It helps me to feel better about my design!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 23:33:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/7885#M7879</guid>
      <dc:creator>parag</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-19T23:33:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: D efficiency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/243915#M48119</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have multiple designs with D, G and A Efficiencies of 100%. Since 100% is not possible are these good designs or should I reassess the number of factors and runs to obtain a more reasonable %?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 16:47:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/243915#M48119</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hamilto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-30T16:47:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: D efficiency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/243916#M48120</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;100% efficiencies are possible. Your designs are likely just fine.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 16:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/D-efficiency/m-p/243916#M48120</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dan_Obermiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-30T16:54:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

