<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Options for comparing sample size and method from population dataset in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577608#M78518</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;There is a new feature in JMP 17 that might help. See the &lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/17.0/#page/jmp/design-explorer.shtml" target="_self"&gt;Design Explorer&lt;/A&gt; documentation. This analysis is based on the assumptions of linear regression rather than a Monte Carlo simulation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 19:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-12-05T19:15:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Options for comparing sample size and method from population dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577313#M78486</link>
      <description>I’m looking for options to compare sampling size and methodology in an RCBD population dataset. The dataset is from an animal floor pen study (14 animals/pen = EU). Weight and other variables were collected from 100% of EU.&lt;BR /&gt;The idea is to look at the dataset and evaluate different scenarios for selecting samples (Randomly from pen, Randomly _# of animals, witching a stand deviation, _# within a standard deviation; and compare the analysis between.&lt;BR /&gt;So far this has been achieved by simulating the sampling method (5 times each) with Excel and exporting subsets to JMP for analysis.&lt;BR /&gt;I am sure there is a better more streamlined way to achieve this directly in JMP but I’m not sure what to do. Any help is appreciated!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 23:57:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577313#M78486</guid>
      <dc:creator>NoSQLPanther727</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-10T23:57:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Options for comparing sample size and method from population dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577501#M78502</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This might not be exactly what you're asking for, but Covariate Factors in the Custom Designer can select optimal samples for an experiment. Here's a &lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Mastering-JMP/Developer-Tutorial-Handling-Covariates-Effectively-when/ta-p/430161" target="_self"&gt;Mastering JMP Webinar&lt;/A&gt; (the whole video is informative, but subsetting rows is specifically discussed starting at around the 48 minute mark).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 17:02:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577501#M78502</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jed_Campbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-05T17:02:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Options for comparing sample size and method from population dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577564#M78507</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;First, welcome to the community. &amp;nbsp;I must admit, I don't fully understand your situation. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. You are using a RCBD, what are the factors you are manipulating within block? &amp;nbsp;How do you propose to handle the block effect? &amp;nbsp;Fixed or random effect? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. What do you mean by "sampling size and methodology"?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. It appears you are confounding Pen with the block. &amp;nbsp;I could also argue your situation is more aligned with sampling vs. DOE. &amp;nbsp;You could have multiple layers nested depending on hypotheses to identify sources of variation in the study.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4. I'm not sure how simulation would help as I'm not sure how variance is being estimated.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is needed is to know: What questions you are trying to answer? &amp;nbsp;What hypotheses do you have? &amp;nbsp;What are you measuring? &amp;nbsp;How adequate is the measurement system? &amp;nbsp;How representative is your study of the true population?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:12:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577564#M78507</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-05T18:12:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Options for comparing sample size and method from population dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577587#M78510</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Clarification:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. RCBD--Feed and Weigh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-- Fixed Effects = Trt&amp;nbsp; (4 Trts)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--Random Effect = Block (13 Reps/Trt)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--Response = Live Weight -- additional performance metrics (although these aren't currently of interest)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Collected Data from all 14 Animals From all Pens and analyzed the data using Fit Model-Least Squared Means.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Now I would like to use the population data and do some "what-if" type scenarios. Say I only collected LW from 1 animal/Pen (randomly and/or within a SD of the Pen Mean) or 6 animals/pen (randomly&amp;nbsp;and/or within a SD of the Pen Mean)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I want to compare the analysis between these what if scenarios&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. I'm sorry but I'm not entirely sure how to respond to this, but I'll give it a go.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I would like to see how the # of animals (sampled)&amp;nbsp; and method used for sampling (randomly or with a SD of the Pen Mean) impacts the ability to detect differences between treatments; and the amount of variation in output.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. Simulation (picking diff # of Animal, with the 2 Selection Methods ) were replicated 5 times using excel.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The reason we simulated the scenarios, is because the # of animals/pen availible for Random/within SD of Mean avail. for selection was less than the actual pop./pen.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:44:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577587#M78510</guid>
      <dc:creator>NoSQLPanther727</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-05T18:44:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Options for comparing sample size and method from population dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577590#M78513</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the Link, I'll give it a watch and see if it might help my situation!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:46:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577590#M78513</guid>
      <dc:creator>NoSQLPanther727</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-05T18:46:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Options for comparing sample size and method from population dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577595#M78514</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Which version of JMP are you using (standard or Pro)?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:48:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577595#M78514</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jed_Campbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-05T18:48:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Options for comparing sample size and method from population dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577608#M78518</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is a new feature in JMP 17 that might help. See the &lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/17.0/#page/jmp/design-explorer.shtml" target="_self"&gt;Design Explorer&lt;/A&gt; documentation. This analysis is based on the assumptions of linear regression rather than a Monte Carlo simulation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 19:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577608#M78518</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-05T19:15:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Options for comparing sample size and method from population dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577807#M78529</link>
      <description>Standard JMP 17</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 05:38:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Options-for-comparing-sample-size-and-method-from-population/m-p/577807#M78529</guid>
      <dc:creator>NoSQLPanther727</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-06T05:38:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

