<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic using DOE for OFAT experiments in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/using-DOE-for-OFAT-experiments/m-p/546983#M76456</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;just wondering, would it be useful to use a DOE if you are doing an OFAT (one factor at a time experiment) experiment?&amp;nbsp; would you get any more statistical understanding from the DOE than if you just did the scan and a regression analysis?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 21:11:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LogitPorcupine1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-08T21:11:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>using DOE for OFAT experiments</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/using-DOE-for-OFAT-experiments/m-p/546983#M76456</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;just wondering, would it be useful to use a DOE if you are doing an OFAT (one factor at a time experiment) experiment?&amp;nbsp; would you get any more statistical understanding from the DOE than if you just did the scan and a regression analysis?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 21:11:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/using-DOE-for-OFAT-experiments/m-p/546983#M76456</guid>
      <dc:creator>LogitPorcupine1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-08T21:11:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: using DOE for OFAT experiments</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/using-DOE-for-OFAT-experiments/m-p/547064#M76459</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/35760"&gt;@LogitPorcupine1&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have several factors in your system, I don't see why you wouldn't use DoE instead of OFAT approach.&lt;BR /&gt;DoE has many benefits compared to OFAT, here are some :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Limited (and planned/controlled in advance !) number of experiments,&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Interactions and non-linear effects can be studied,&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Mathematical model to explain or predict response(s) variations,&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;High efficiency (information vs. number of experiments),&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Errors are shared equally/homogeneously in the design space,&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Possibility to create constraints/customs designs&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Iterative process through "Augmentation" and a lot of strategies possible : you can start by screening main effects, then checking interactions, and finally build a robust Response Surface Model for predicting accurately your responses, ...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are a lot of ressources to learn DoE with JMP, here are some :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/en_hk/events/getting-started-with-jmp/doe-intro-kit.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Design of Experiments Intro Kit | Getting Started with JMP&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/en_hk/online-statistics-course.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Statistical Thinking (STIPS) - Free Online Statistics Course | JMP&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/en_sg/online-statistics-course/design-of-experiments.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Design of Experiments (DOE) Course | JMP&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/en_in/academic/course-materials/doe.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Design of Experiments | JMP&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can also check this very nice article on Nature about the benefits of using DoE in order to avoid "blank spots/area" in your experimental space (Figure 2) :&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-47846-6" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;A Design of Experiments (DoE) Approach Accelerates the Optimization of Copper-Mediated 18F-Fluorination Reactions of Arylstannanes | Scientific Reports (nature.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this will help your reflexion and understanding,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:20:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/using-DOE-for-OFAT-experiments/m-p/547064#M76459</guid>
      <dc:creator>Victor_G</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-21T07:20:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: using DOE for OFAT experiments</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/using-DOE-for-OFAT-experiments/m-p/547291#M76473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just to add to Victor's excellent list of why do multi-factor experiments vs. OFAT: &amp;nbsp;OFAT's have an extremely narrow inference space. &amp;nbsp;ALL other factors must be kept constant during OFAT. &amp;nbsp;The narrow inference space negatively affects your confidence in extrapolating the results beyond the current study.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 13:57:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/using-DOE-for-OFAT-experiments/m-p/547291#M76473</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-21T13:57:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

