<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Principal Components (PCA) Formula in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Principal-Components-PCA-Formula/m-p/537875#M75919</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Looking at Principal Components in JMP and saving PC1 onto dataset (Principle Components: on Covariances --&amp;gt; Save columns --&amp;gt; Principle Components --&amp;gt; 1 --&amp;gt; Enter ), upon drilling into the formula there is a constant variable added at the end of the equation which in-turn makes most variables in column negative.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When performing PC1 in Minitab while using the exact same dataset value, the formula comes up with no constant variable at the end (identical to JMP equation except for the +constant variable).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insight on why JMP adds constant to formula for PC is appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Version: JMP 16&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 23:53:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nicole0</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-10T23:53:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Principal Components (PCA) Formula</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Principal-Components-PCA-Formula/m-p/537875#M75919</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Looking at Principal Components in JMP and saving PC1 onto dataset (Principle Components: on Covariances --&amp;gt; Save columns --&amp;gt; Principle Components --&amp;gt; 1 --&amp;gt; Enter ), upon drilling into the formula there is a constant variable added at the end of the equation which in-turn makes most variables in column negative.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When performing PC1 in Minitab while using the exact same dataset value, the formula comes up with no constant variable at the end (identical to JMP equation except for the +constant variable).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insight on why JMP adds constant to formula for PC is appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Version: JMP 16&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 23:53:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Principal-Components-PCA-Formula/m-p/537875#M75919</guid>
      <dc:creator>nicole0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-10T23:53:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Principal Components (PCA) Formula</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Principal-Components-PCA-Formula/m-p/537941#M75923</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;First, welcome to the community. Which method did you use for extraction? Centered or unscaled?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/16.2/?os=mac&amp;amp;source=application#page/jmp/principal-components-report-options.shtml#" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/16.2/?os=mac&amp;amp;source=application#page/jmp/principal-components-report-options.shtml#&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2022 14:13:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Principal-Components-PCA-Formula/m-p/537941#M75923</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-27T14:13:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

