<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is the power analysis for my full factorial is too low? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-the-power-analysis-for-my-full-factorial-is-too-low/m-p/534988#M75741</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The power analysis option is a &lt;STRONG&gt;tool&lt;/STRONG&gt; that you can use to calculate expected power.&amp;nbsp; The power is based on the signal to noise ratio which is based on the ratio of anticipated coefficient to anticipated RMSE.&amp;nbsp; By default the ratio is 1:1 which is very low, hence low power.&amp;nbsp; Put in larger values for anticipated coefficients to see the effect of a larger S/N ratio.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is a detailed explanation of how to use the tool:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/16.1/#page/jmp/power-analysis.shtml?os=win&amp;amp;source=application#ww223239" target="_self"&gt;https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/16.1/#page/jmp/power-analysis.shtml?os=win&amp;amp;source=application#ww223239&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There have been a number of excellent discussions on this topic - I suggest you do a search for power analysis.&amp;nbsp; Here is one such discussion:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Should-I-consider-power-analysis-in-DOE/m-p/501063" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Should-I-consider-power-analysis-in-DOE/m-p/501063&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 06:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>David_Burnham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-08-18T06:43:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is the power analysis for my full factorial is too low?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-the-power-analysis-for-my-full-factorial-is-too-low/m-p/534916#M75737</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did a screening design and the two resulting main factors are temperature (continuous) and solvent (categorical).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to do a full factorial with these two factors at 3 levels.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I decided to opt for a full factorial since the total number of experiments is very manageable (9), but when I check the power&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;analysis, I feel that it might be too low? I was reading that you want the power to be at least 0.8.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried adding some center points but it doesn't get me close to 0.8 --- and despite replicates reaching that threshold, 18 experiments is too many.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Advice is appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 21:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-the-power-analysis-for-my-full-factorial-is-too-low/m-p/534916#M75737</guid>
      <dc:creator>DashNap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-08T21:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the power analysis for my full factorial is too low?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-the-power-analysis-for-my-full-factorial-is-too-low/m-p/534988#M75741</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The power analysis option is a &lt;STRONG&gt;tool&lt;/STRONG&gt; that you can use to calculate expected power.&amp;nbsp; The power is based on the signal to noise ratio which is based on the ratio of anticipated coefficient to anticipated RMSE.&amp;nbsp; By default the ratio is 1:1 which is very low, hence low power.&amp;nbsp; Put in larger values for anticipated coefficients to see the effect of a larger S/N ratio.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is a detailed explanation of how to use the tool:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/16.1/#page/jmp/power-analysis.shtml?os=win&amp;amp;source=application#ww223239" target="_self"&gt;https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/16.1/#page/jmp/power-analysis.shtml?os=win&amp;amp;source=application#ww223239&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There have been a number of excellent discussions on this topic - I suggest you do a search for power analysis.&amp;nbsp; Here is one such discussion:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Should-I-consider-power-analysis-in-DOE/m-p/501063" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Should-I-consider-power-analysis-in-DOE/m-p/501063&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 06:43:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-the-power-analysis-for-my-full-factorial-is-too-low/m-p/534988#M75741</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_Burnham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-18T06:43:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

