<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Option for Duncan post-hoc analysis in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Option-for-Duncan-post-hoc-analysis/m-p/534329#M75689</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't think so. One for the &lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Wish-List/idb-p/jmp-wish-list" target="_self"&gt;JMP Wish List&lt;/A&gt;, I think.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:09:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Phil_Kay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-08-16T15:09:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Option for Duncan post-hoc analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Option-for-Duncan-post-hoc-analysis/m-p/526707#M75068</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to perform Duncan post-hoc test in JMP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 14:42:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Option-for-Duncan-post-hoc-analysis/m-p/526707#M75068</guid>
      <dc:creator>billi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T14:42:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Option for Duncan post-hoc analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Option-for-Duncan-post-hoc-analysis/m-p/534329#M75689</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't think so. One for the &lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Wish-List/idb-p/jmp-wish-list" target="_self"&gt;JMP Wish List&lt;/A&gt;, I think.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:09:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Option-for-Duncan-post-hoc-analysis/m-p/534329#M75689</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phil_Kay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-16T15:09:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Option for Duncan post-hoc analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Option-for-Duncan-post-hoc-analysis/m-p/534335#M75690</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1888"&gt;@Phil_Kay&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;is correct. JMP does provide the pre-cursor test that is mentioned in the &lt;A href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duncan%27s_new_multiple_range_test" target="_self"&gt;development of the Duncan's MRT&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MRT.PNG" style="width: 740px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/44811iDD5350C929498450/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="MRT.PNG" alt="MRT.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps that form will suffice for now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:25:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Option-for-Duncan-post-hoc-analysis/m-p/534335#M75690</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-16T15:25:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

