<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: one sided confidence interval in capability calculations in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/one-sided-confidence-interval-in-capability-calculations/m-p/529308#M75282</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not 100% sure, but I think you might have to calculate two-sided 90% confidence interval and then use only the lower confidence interval &lt;LI-MESSAGE title="One-sided confidence intervals for proportions" uid="53637" url="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/One-sided-confidence-intervals-for-proportions/m-p/53637#U53637" discussion_style_icon_css="lia-mention-container-editor-message lia-img-icon-forum-thread lia-fa-icon lia-fa-forum lia-fa-thread lia-fa"&gt;&lt;/LI-MESSAGE&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 12:50:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jthi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-08-02T12:50:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>one sided confidence interval in capability calculations</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/one-sided-confidence-interval-in-capability-calculations/m-p/529287#M75280</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi i need to calculate the lower bound ppk with one sided CI of 95&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The default option is two sided how can i calculate onle the lower bound ppk without the upper CI&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in minitab this option exist see attached , where is the same option in JMP&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="CausalRankYak38_0-1659443060796.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/44489iF201080F262CF7AB/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="CausalRankYak38_0-1659443060796.png" alt="CausalRankYak38_0-1659443060796.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="CausalRankYak38_1-1659443120592.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/44490i9F00DDC5FBA0C1CF/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="CausalRankYak38_1-1659443120592.png" alt="CausalRankYak38_1-1659443120592.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:53:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/one-sided-confidence-interval-in-capability-calculations/m-p/529287#M75280</guid>
      <dc:creator>CausalRankYak38</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T00:53:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: one sided confidence interval in capability calculations</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/one-sided-confidence-interval-in-capability-calculations/m-p/529308#M75282</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not 100% sure, but I think you might have to calculate two-sided 90% confidence interval and then use only the lower confidence interval &lt;LI-MESSAGE title="One-sided confidence intervals for proportions" uid="53637" url="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/One-sided-confidence-intervals-for-proportions/m-p/53637#U53637" discussion_style_icon_css="lia-mention-container-editor-message lia-img-icon-forum-thread lia-fa-icon lia-fa-forum lia-fa-thread lia-fa"&gt;&lt;/LI-MESSAGE&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 12:50:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/one-sided-confidence-interval-in-capability-calculations/m-p/529308#M75282</guid>
      <dc:creator>jthi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-02T12:50:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: one sided confidence interval in capability calculations</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/one-sided-confidence-interval-in-capability-calculations/m-p/529735#M75310</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there an option to remove the upper CI in the setting? the results change based on that and i cant perform it manually because i need to show the final&amp;nbsp; result in the report&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 08:35:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/one-sided-confidence-interval-in-capability-calculations/m-p/529735#M75310</guid>
      <dc:creator>CausalRankYak38</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-03T08:35:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

