<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Minimize donor variability in studies in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Minimize-donor-variability-in-studies/m-p/522059#M74707</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It seems like you want to treat an effect in your model as a 'block' effect...that is donor. Whether or not an effect is treated as a 'block' depends on how the data was collected wrt to the experimental design. If 'donor' was treated as a blocking factor wrt to the experimental design then you can incorporate that effect into the model in a way that is appropriate wrt to how the design was constructed. Here's a JMP On Demand video you may find informative regarding blocking and DOE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/en_gb/events/mastering/topics/using-blocking-when-designing-experiments.html" target="_self"&gt;Blocking in DOE with JMP&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And generally speaking I'd stick with the Fit Model platform for your modeling work...not Fit Y by X for inclusion of block effects in a model.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 20:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>P_Bartell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-15T20:18:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Minimize donor variability in studies</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Minimize-donor-variability-in-studies/m-p/521992#M74703</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In our studies, we always use multiple donors and we know that there's variability from the donors. Can we use fit y by x and choose "donor" for blocking?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 21:10:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Minimize-donor-variability-in-studies/m-p/521992#M74703</guid>
      <dc:creator>JMPuser5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-08T21:10:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimize donor variability in studies</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Minimize-donor-variability-in-studies/m-p/522059#M74707</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It seems like you want to treat an effect in your model as a 'block' effect...that is donor. Whether or not an effect is treated as a 'block' depends on how the data was collected wrt to the experimental design. If 'donor' was treated as a blocking factor wrt to the experimental design then you can incorporate that effect into the model in a way that is appropriate wrt to how the design was constructed. Here's a JMP On Demand video you may find informative regarding blocking and DOE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/en_gb/events/mastering/topics/using-blocking-when-designing-experiments.html" target="_self"&gt;Blocking in DOE with JMP&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And generally speaking I'd stick with the Fit Model platform for your modeling work...not Fit Y by X for inclusion of block effects in a model.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 20:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Minimize-donor-variability-in-studies/m-p/522059#M74707</guid>
      <dc:creator>P_Bartell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-15T20:18:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

