https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Chi-square-P-values/m-p/484911#M72900 <P>Try double clicking on top of the &lt;.0001* and then changing Format from PValue to something else which you seem as better fit:</P> <P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="jthi_0-1651865921341.png" style="width: 400px;"><img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/42293i9C46BD3F5643058A/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;px=400" role="button" title="jthi_0-1651865921341.png" alt="jthi_0-1651865921341.png" /></span></P> <P>&nbsp;</P> Fri, 06 May 2022 19:39:48 GMT jthi 2022-05-06T19:39:48Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Chi-square-P-values/m-p/484891#M72899 <P>Using the fit X by Y analysis of categorical variables can I get the actual p value instead of just &lt;0.0001?</P> Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:49:06 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Chi-square-P-values/m-p/484891#M72899 StructuralLamb1 2023-06-09T00:49:06Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Chi-square-P-values/m-p/484911#M72900 <P>Try double clicking on top of the &lt;.0001* and then changing Format from PValue to something else which you seem as better fit:</P> <P><span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="jthi_0-1651865921341.png" style="width: 400px;"><img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/42293i9C46BD3F5643058A/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;px=400" role="button" title="jthi_0-1651865921341.png" alt="jthi_0-1651865921341.png" /></span></P> <P>&nbsp;</P> Fri, 06 May 2022 19:39:48 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Chi-square-P-values/m-p/484911#M72900 jthi 2022-05-06T19:39:48Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Chi-square-P-values/m-p/484914#M72902 <P>Thanks!! That worked&nbsp;</P> Fri, 06 May 2022 20:44:44 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Chi-square-P-values/m-p/484914#M72902 StructuralLamb1 2022-05-06T20:44:44Z