<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: JMP &amp;gt; Statistical Methods &amp;gt; How to Compare Multiple Proportions? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Statistical-Methods-gt-How-to-Compare-Multiple/m-p/480893#M72536</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/958"&gt;@ron_horne&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the thorough answer. The critical step I had missed was using the Binomial distribution in the GLM model.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'll look into the Add-in.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TS&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 13:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Thierry_S</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-04-21T13:12:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>JMP &gt; Statistical Methods &gt; How to Compare Multiple Proportions?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Statistical-Methods-gt-How-to-Compare-Multiple/m-p/480850#M72529</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi JMP Community,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would like to know which statistical method(s) in JMP is the most appropriate to test multiple proportions? I am familiar with the Fit Y by X Contingency analysis for comparing two proportions. Still, I cannot figure out if there is a generalized platform to compare multiple proportions across conditions or time points.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Typical Scenario (see mock data attached):&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I monitor a binary outcome (e.g., response / non-response) through time and for multiple conditions (e.g., treatment, baseline status, and gender). I want to compare the effect of the conditions globally and at specific time points.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;System: Windows 10&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;JMP Version: 16.1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any suggestions would be welcome.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TS&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:48:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Statistical-Methods-gt-How-to-Compare-Multiple/m-p/480850#M72529</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thierry_S</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T00:48:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JMP &gt; Statistical Methods &gt; How to Compare Multiple Proportions?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Statistical-Methods-gt-How-to-Compare-Multiple/m-p/480871#M72532</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11634"&gt;@Thierry_S&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;just by looking at the column names and imagining the scenario behind them i think i have an idea. it may be exactly what you need in some circumstances. If i understand correctly, ID is repeated over time, time is the "within" effect while gender, original status and treatment are "between" effects. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since there is time and baseline status i would think a mixed model for repated measures is the way to go.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i would get the linear mixed model add in: &lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Generalized-Linear-Mixed-Model-Add-in/ta-p/284627" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Generalized-Linear-Mixed-Model-Add-in/ta-p/284627&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Once you get it you can use it to manually enter the following roles:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-jsl"&gt;Fit Model(
	Y( :OUTCOME ),
	Effects(
		:BASELINE STATUS, :TREATMENT, :GENDER, :TIME, :BASELINE STATUS * :TREATMENT,
		:BASELINE STATUS * :GENDER, :BASELINE STATUS * :TIME, :TREATMENT * :GENDER,
		:TREATMENT * :TIME, :GENDER * :TIME, :BASELINE STATUS * :TREATMENT * :GENDER,
		:BASELINE STATUS * :TREATMENT * :TIME, :BASELINE STATUS * :GENDER * :TIME,
		:TREATMENT * :GENDER * :TIME,
		:BASELINE STATUS * :TREATMENT * :GENDER * :TIME,
		:ID[:BASELINE STATUS, :TREATMENT, :GENDER] &amp;amp; Random
	),
	Personality( "Generalized Linear Model" ),
	GLM Distribution( "Binomial" ),
	Link Function( "Logit" )
);&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;problem with the current fit model platform (jmp pro 16) is that it doesn't sport this so you need to use the add in.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When running with the addin this full factorial repeated measures model i get singularity issues so perhaps some interactions that do not have any variance should be removed. perhaps even worth running first without interactions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;as a side note, this nifty tool can help sort the out the "between" / "within" effects very quickly: &lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Full-Factorial-Repeated-Measures-ANOVA-Add-In/ta-p/23904" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Full-Factorial-Repeated-Measures-ANOVA-Add-In/ta-p/23904&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;let us know if any of this is useful,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ron&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:59:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Statistical-Methods-gt-How-to-Compare-Multiple/m-p/480871#M72532</guid>
      <dc:creator>ron_horne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-21T08:59:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JMP &gt; Statistical Methods &gt; How to Compare Multiple Proportions?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Statistical-Methods-gt-How-to-Compare-Multiple/m-p/480893#M72536</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/958"&gt;@ron_horne&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the thorough answer. The critical step I had missed was using the Binomial distribution in the GLM model.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'll look into the Add-in.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;TS&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2022 13:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-gt-Statistical-Methods-gt-How-to-Compare-Multiple/m-p/480893#M72536</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thierry_S</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-21T13:12:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

