<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Sampling size conundrum in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Sampling-size-conundrum/m-p/475818#M72035</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi All,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How can I prove that there is practically 0 defects (0.05 ppm), without taking millions of samples? I have a pass/fail test.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has anyone else within this community faced a similar issue?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you in advance!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 20:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vipul</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-10T20:50:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sampling size conundrum</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Sampling-size-conundrum/m-p/475818#M72035</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi All,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How can I prove that there is practically 0 defects (0.05 ppm), without taking millions of samples? I have a pass/fail test.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has anyone else within this community faced a similar issue?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you in advance!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 20:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Sampling-size-conundrum/m-p/475818#M72035</guid>
      <dc:creator>vipul</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-10T20:50:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sampling size conundrum</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Sampling-size-conundrum/m-p/475862#M72037</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well that's a loaded question. &amp;nbsp;First, you can't "prove" anything (perhaps you can change your degree of confidence in your conclusions). &amp;nbsp;Second, how do you know the failure rate is .05ppm? &amp;nbsp;How do you know your test is "good" (measurement error)? &amp;nbsp;Do you know if the process is consistent?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You could take either a probabilistic approach or an analytical approach to building your confidence in the low failure rate. &amp;nbsp;I usually don't care much about whether the rate is "correct" or not. &amp;nbsp;I am usually applying statistical method to discover what factors affect the rate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 13:13:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Sampling-size-conundrum/m-p/475862#M72037</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-04T13:13:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

