https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/472249#M71688 <P>probably you used "e" in calculator which is 2,71828. Try 10^-57</P> Wed, 23 Mar 2022 12:57:33 GMT Metin_Tueluemen 2022-03-23T12:57:33Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/307974#M56236 <P>Hi can someone help me?</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>I am running logistic regression with two x variables below shows my effect summary with the logworth. Now I understand the logworth basically takes the -log(p-value) for each x variable and that works for the p-value 0.00219. What i am confused about is the logworth of for the p-value 0.0000, how is it getting 56.125? Moreover in other regression models I've run into different logworths for p-value&nbsp; of 0. Can someone please explain this to me so I can move on with my life?<span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="jMOP.PNG" style="width: 400px;"><img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/26780i1759E01849E47FB5/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;px=400" role="button" title="jMOP.PNG" alt="jMOP.PNG" /></span></P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Thank you!!!</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Rachel</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>#statistics</P> Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:21:23 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/307974#M56236 rlw268 2023-06-09T00:21:23Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/307995#M56237 <P>try double clicking on the p-value and change the format to show more decimal places to see what the actual p-value is.</P> Tue, 15 Sep 2020 21:31:11 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/307995#M56237 txnelson 2020-09-15T21:31:11Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/307997#M56239 <P><a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2687">@txnelson</a> well thank you cause i didn't realize I could do that. With that being said the value is 7.5e-57 but when I take the -log of that it gives me <SPAN>49.8784920133. So I'm closer but still not spot on.&nbsp;</SPAN></P> Tue, 15 Sep 2020 21:40:46 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/307997#M56239 rlw268 2020-09-15T21:40:46Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/308036#M56241 Are you sure you used -Log10?<BR />Best,<BR />TS Tue, 15 Sep 2020 23:20:01 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/308036#M56241 Thierry_S 2020-09-15T23:20:01Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/308037#M56242 <P>-log10 returns 49.8785</P> Tue, 15 Sep 2020 23:24:24 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/308037#M56242 rlw268 2020-09-15T23:24:24Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/308038#M56243 Let's review: Log10 (7.5e-57) = Log10 (7.5) + Log10 (e-57) = Log10 (7.5) - 57 = 0.875 - 57 = -56.125<BR /> Tue, 15 Sep 2020 23:29:43 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/308038#M56243 Thierry_S 2020-09-15T23:29:43Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/308039#M56244 Well thank you, I did it with a calculator and thats where I got the 49 answer. Thank you for doing it out! Tue, 15 Sep 2020 23:38:52 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/308039#M56244 rlw268 2020-09-15T23:38:52Z https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/472249#M71688 <P>probably you used "e" in calculator which is 2,71828. Try 10^-57</P> Wed, 23 Mar 2022 12:57:33 GMT https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Effect-Summary-and-the-Logworth-with-p-value-of-0/m-p/472249#M71688 Metin_Tueluemen 2022-03-23T12:57:33Z