<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Need some advice regarding parallelism test. in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Need-some-advice-regarding-parallelism-test/m-p/469509#M71344</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using JMP version 16.1 and working on comparing a nonlinear standard curve (ID- STD) against 3 other&amp;nbsp;nonlinear curves (ID- Set A, B, C) to see if they are similar.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I did was plotting the 4 curves using analyze&amp;gt;specialized model&amp;gt;nonlinear set up as attached. After that I select logistic 4P and perform Parallelism test and Equivalence test. The p-value obtained is 0.0056 which is below 0.05 and all stats in equivalence test does not match the STD curve. Thus, I am right to say these 4 curves are not comparable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I did a normalization of the results and did the same test but this time round I select logistic 2P for the curve and I got a P-value of 0.6794 which shows 4 curves are comparable but the&amp;nbsp;stats in equivalence test does not match the STD curve. Thus, I am quite lost of the data I have and not too sure how to interpret it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any advice would be great. Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;I have attached the data I use for the study.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marcoz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-09T00:46:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Need some advice regarding parallelism test.</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Need-some-advice-regarding-parallelism-test/m-p/469509#M71344</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using JMP version 16.1 and working on comparing a nonlinear standard curve (ID- STD) against 3 other&amp;nbsp;nonlinear curves (ID- Set A, B, C) to see if they are similar.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I did was plotting the 4 curves using analyze&amp;gt;specialized model&amp;gt;nonlinear set up as attached. After that I select logistic 4P and perform Parallelism test and Equivalence test. The p-value obtained is 0.0056 which is below 0.05 and all stats in equivalence test does not match the STD curve. Thus, I am right to say these 4 curves are not comparable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I did a normalization of the results and did the same test but this time round I select logistic 2P for the curve and I got a P-value of 0.6794 which shows 4 curves are comparable but the&amp;nbsp;stats in equivalence test does not match the STD curve. Thus, I am quite lost of the data I have and not too sure how to interpret it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any advice would be great. Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;I have attached the data I use for the study.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Need-some-advice-regarding-parallelism-test/m-p/469509#M71344</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcoz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T00:46:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Need some advice regarding parallelism test.</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Need-some-advice-regarding-parallelism-test/m-p/469949#M71395</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;First of all, the choice of the Logistic 4P model is overly optimistic. There is only the lower asymptote and no inflection point, so you won't have a good estimate of the upper asymptote for comparison. This situation also leads to unstable estimates for all the parameters.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Second, why use a complicated non-linear model for this data? A plot of result obtained versus concentration appears to be linear. The Fit Curve platform can fit such models and assess them for parallelism, too.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Fit Curve.PNG" style="width: 492px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/40840iEE5F3D3C70F1DEF6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Fit Curve.PNG" alt="Fit Curve.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 18:05:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Need-some-advice-regarding-parallelism-test/m-p/469949#M71395</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-15T18:05:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Need some advice regarding parallelism test.</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Need-some-advice-regarding-parallelism-test/m-p/470059#M71408</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Hi Mark, thank you so much for your advice. I guess I need to extend the standard curve to find out the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;upper asymptote.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The reason for the non-linear curve is recommended by the Elisa assay kit as it stated that using linear regression analysis to interpolate values for samples can lead to significant inaccuracies.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:42:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Need-some-advice-regarding-parallelism-test/m-p/470059#M71408</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marcoz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-15T23:42:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

