<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Prediction Expression from DOE not matching in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Prediction-Expression-from-DOE-not-matching/m-p/462245#M70702</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You are missing 'coding' probably. The JMP DOE platforms add a Coding column property to the factor data columns. Fit Least Squares uses this property to 'code' the factor levels. You can see this if you examine the column properties. And then JMP changes the labels in Fit Least Squares by appending the low and high values in parentheses after the factor name. Look at the Parameter Estimates table, for example.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can prepare the formula for non-statistical software like Excel easily. Open the formula editor on the prediction formula. The entire formula should be selected (surrounded by blue rectangle.) Find the red triangle at the top center of the editor. Click it and select Simplify. Then save the formula. Actually, copy it first so you can paste it in a cell in the spreadsheet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-18T19:29:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Prediction Expression from DOE not matching</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Prediction-Expression-from-DOE-not-matching/m-p/462176#M70698</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a prediction expression from my DOE that when popped into excel to make a calculator, the results are not consistent with what populates the imp table column when I create a "Predict Formula" column in my table. It is very close for the center values but off for the values towards the limits of the model. What am I missing??&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 21:08:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Prediction-Expression-from-DOE-not-matching/m-p/462176#M70698</guid>
      <dc:creator>JasonMLawhorn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-08T21:08:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Prediction Expression from DOE not matching</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Prediction-Expression-from-DOE-not-matching/m-p/462245#M70702</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You are missing 'coding' probably. The JMP DOE platforms add a Coding column property to the factor data columns. Fit Least Squares uses this property to 'code' the factor levels. You can see this if you examine the column properties. And then JMP changes the labels in Fit Least Squares by appending the low and high values in parentheses after the factor name. Look at the Parameter Estimates table, for example.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can prepare the formula for non-statistical software like Excel easily. Open the formula editor on the prediction formula. The entire formula should be selected (surrounded by blue rectangle.) Find the red triangle at the top center of the editor. Click it and select Simplify. Then save the formula. Actually, copy it first so you can paste it in a cell in the spreadsheet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Prediction-Expression-from-DOE-not-matching/m-p/462245#M70702</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-18T19:29:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

