<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Restrict combinations in DOE in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/445788#M69359</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you saying that either A or B is present at some concentration, but not simultaneously? Then you might have one two-level categorical factor to identify the ingredient (e.g., levels A and B) and another factor for the non-zero concentration range.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 15:48:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-16T15:48:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Restrict combinations in DOE</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/445743#M69357</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm sorry if the answer is completely obvious, I just started using JMP.&amp;nbsp;I'm trying to design a DOE containing 1 response and 10 factors, let's call them A-J for now. The factors are either excluded from the run, or present at a certain concentration. In the eventual design certain combinations are restricted, namely A-B, C-D, E-F, G-H and I-J. I tried playing around with the factor constraint option, but I can't figure it out. Can anyone clarify what to do? Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 21:07:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/445743#M69357</guid>
      <dc:creator>MickE94</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-08T21:07:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Restrict combinations in DOE</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/445788#M69359</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you saying that either A or B is present at some concentration, but not simultaneously? Then you might have one two-level categorical factor to identify the ingredient (e.g., levels A and B) and another factor for the non-zero concentration range.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 15:48:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/445788#M69359</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-16T15:48:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Restrict combinations in DOE</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/445792#M69361</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Indeed, A and B can not be present simultaneous.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ah yes that makes sense! But how does the factor for both ingredients being excluded look like? Or can I also make it 3-level categorical?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:05:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/445792#M69361</guid>
      <dc:creator>MickE94</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-16T16:05:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Restrict combinations in DOE</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/445818#M69364</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I generally recommend against using 0 as a level for a continuous factor. Using 0 turns it into a categorical factor (absent, present). It is better to use two non-zero levels so that you can see the effect of changing the level.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you still need to cover the case where both A and B are 0 (absent)?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 18:58:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/445818#M69364</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-16T18:58:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Restrict combinations in DOE</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/446024#M69370</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I understand the case of making a categorical factor for A or B present, and why it is recommended. But I'm confused on what to do with the "A and B absent" factor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:24:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/446024#M69370</guid>
      <dc:creator>MickE94</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-17T08:24:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Restrict combinations in DOE</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/446066#M69374</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am sorry but I do not understand your confusion. Please explain it so I can clarify my answer for you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is a design based on my approach, so we have something tangible to discuss.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="design.PNG" style="width: 566px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/38507iF950112D459C24C1/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="design.PNG" alt="design.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:40:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/446066#M69374</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-17T14:40:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Restrict combinations in DOE</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/447376#M69423</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ah yes now I understand your approach!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would it also work to make each ingredient 3-level categorical, including A, B or 0? Or do you foresee problems with such an approach?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2021 15:15:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/447376#M69423</guid>
      <dc:creator>MickE94</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-21T15:15:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Restrict combinations in DOE</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/448393#M69527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think your scheme works if you have several pairs of ingredients and some formulations should not include either of the two options for a given pair.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 16:04:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Restrict-combinations-in-DOE/m-p/448393#M69527</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-30T16:04:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

