<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Tolerance inerval vs. Distribution profiler in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Tolerance-inerval-vs-Distribution-profiler/m-p/436920#M68592</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The distribution profiler shows the confidence interval, not the tolerance interval (at least it does that with my installation). This might explain why you are seeing 99.9959% "confidence" (not tolerance) for a value of 2.114196.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 13:33:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ressel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-16T13:33:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Tolerance inerval vs. Distribution profiler</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Tolerance-inerval-vs-Distribution-profiler/m-p/436524#M68565</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've generated 20 numbers from standard normal distribution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One sided tolerance interval for proportion of 97.5% is 2.114196.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the othe hand, the distribution profiler shows that for 2.114196 the upper bound is 99.9959%&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I missing something? I was thinking that the upper bound of the the distribution profiler has to be equal/approx. equal to the proportion of the tolerance interval.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to understand these numbers because of the following need.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to calc a tolerance interval for Gamma/Johnson distribution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JMP does not have this option. I was thinking about distribution profiler of Gamma dist. as a solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there some way to cal a tolerance interval for&amp;nbsp;Gamma/Johnson distribution?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="tom_abramov_0-1636992780472.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/37597i82A43084DE62529F/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="tom_abramov_0-1636992780472.png" alt="tom_abramov_0-1636992780472.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:41:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Tolerance-inerval-vs-Distribution-profiler/m-p/436524#M68565</guid>
      <dc:creator>tom_abramov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T00:41:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tolerance inerval vs. Distribution profiler</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Tolerance-inerval-vs-Distribution-profiler/m-p/436920#M68592</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The distribution profiler shows the confidence interval, not the tolerance interval (at least it does that with my installation). This might explain why you are seeing 99.9959% "confidence" (not tolerance) for a value of 2.114196.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2021 13:33:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Tolerance-inerval-vs-Distribution-profiler/m-p/436920#M68592</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ressel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-16T13:33:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

