<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic non-parametric response screening in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/non-parametric-response-screening/m-p/425145#M67462</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I love the response screening platform. Is there a way to choose the fit y-by-x model to be non parametric, so i can compare non-normal distributions? is that the Huber/cauchy options?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 23:38:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ezorlo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-10T23:38:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>non-parametric response screening</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/non-parametric-response-screening/m-p/425145#M67462</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I love the response screening platform. Is there a way to choose the fit y-by-x model to be non parametric, so i can compare non-normal distributions? is that the Huber/cauchy options?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 23:38:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/non-parametric-response-screening/m-p/425145#M67462</guid>
      <dc:creator>ezorlo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-10T23:38:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

