<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Confidence Intervals for functional DoE in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Confidence-Intervals-for-functional-DoE/m-p/412982#M66274</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried to use the functional DoE Platform and have to admit that it works really great. However, I miss the possibility to visualize the uncertainty of my models in the profiler. Is there any way to include a CI . If not analytical solvable, maybe via Bootstrapping?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking forward to your help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 21:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marco_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-08T21:05:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Confidence Intervals for functional DoE</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Confidence-Intervals-for-functional-DoE/m-p/412982#M66274</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried to use the functional DoE Platform and have to admit that it works really great. However, I miss the possibility to visualize the uncertainty of my models in the profiler. Is there any way to include a CI . If not analytical solvable, maybe via Bootstrapping?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking forward to your help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 21:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Confidence-Intervals-for-functional-DoE/m-p/412982#M66274</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marco_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-08T21:05:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confidence Intervals for functional DoE</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Confidence-Intervals-for-functional-DoE/m-p/413084#M66282</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good question. I am pretty sure that JMP Development have thought about this. My understanding is that it is a very complicated because of the different sources of uncertainty. You might want to add this to &lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Wish-List/idb-p/jmp-wish-list" target="_self"&gt;the JMP Wish List&lt;/A&gt;, if it is not already on there.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:39:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Confidence-Intervals-for-functional-DoE/m-p/413084#M66282</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phil_Kay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-27T08:39:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confidence Intervals for functional DoE</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Confidence-Intervals-for-functional-DoE/m-p/413159#M66289</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Done ;)&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the meantime I would really appreciate if someone has any idea for a workaround&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 13:36:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Confidence-Intervals-for-functional-DoE/m-p/413159#M66289</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marco_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-27T13:36:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

