<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Mean Diamond Confidence Intervals in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Mean-Diamond-Confidence-Intervals/m-p/6599#M6593</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm doing a simple Oneway Analysis, ~10 groups each with # of data points ranging up to 20.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I noticed that there are 2 95% CIs that are calculated:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; One set for each group in the Means and Std Dev report below the chart, where CIs are calculated off of the Std Dev of each individual group&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; One set for the Anova, where the Std Dev of all groups are assumed to be the same (calculated off of the Std Dev of the entire population).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The chart shows the mean diamonds, which shows #2 option above. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, 2 of my groups have significantly higher std dev, and I'd like that to be reflected in my chart and CIs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My questions are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to get the Upper/Lower CIs from the "Mean &amp;amp; Std Dev" report to show up on the graph?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; Is there a reason not to do this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:39:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gugiyu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-23T21:39:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mean Diamond Confidence Intervals</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Mean-Diamond-Confidence-Intervals/m-p/6599#M6593</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm doing a simple Oneway Analysis, ~10 groups each with # of data points ranging up to 20.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I noticed that there are 2 95% CIs that are calculated:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; One set for each group in the Means and Std Dev report below the chart, where CIs are calculated off of the Std Dev of each individual group&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; One set for the Anova, where the Std Dev of all groups are assumed to be the same (calculated off of the Std Dev of the entire population).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The chart shows the mean diamonds, which shows #2 option above. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, 2 of my groups have significantly higher std dev, and I'd like that to be reflected in my chart and CIs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My questions are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to get the Upper/Lower CIs from the "Mean &amp;amp; Std Dev" report to show up on the graph?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; Is there a reason not to do this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:39:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Mean-Diamond-Confidence-Intervals/m-p/6599#M6593</guid>
      <dc:creator>gugiyu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-23T21:39:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

