<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: why doesn't the 2D contours graph with Nonpar Density include outliers? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/why-doesn-t-the-2D-contours-graph-with-Nonpar-Density-include/m-p/407642#M65771</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;They are different methods/perspectives by definitions. HDR only has two levels of rings for 50% and 99% to emphasize. One can certainly draw nonparametric density contour with 100 levels and spot the outer 1% in the last ring. Nonparametric density contour provides better sense about how the denseness gradually change from area to area, but does not emphasize what HDR does.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 16:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>peng_liu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-08-06T16:20:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>why doesn't the 2D contours graph with Nonpar Density include outliers?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/why-doesn-t-the-2D-contours-graph-with-Nonpar-Density-include/m-p/407573#M65766</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;why doesn't the&amp;nbsp;2D contours graph with Nonpar Density include outliers? &lt;STRONG&gt;how to&amp;nbsp;include outliers in Nonpar Density 2D contours as in HDR 2D contours?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the picture on the left/top in Nonpar Density , the picture on the right/bottom is HDR on the same variables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="nonpar.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34809iBE4177C79183DADA/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="nonpar.png" alt="nonpar.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="hdr.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/34808i421BF3ED9060634D/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="hdr.png" alt="hdr.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2023 11:16:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/why-doesn-t-the-2D-contours-graph-with-Nonpar-Density-include/m-p/407573#M65766</guid>
      <dc:creator>leonxf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-11T11:16:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: why doesn't the 2D contours graph with Nonpar Density include outliers?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/why-doesn-t-the-2D-contours-graph-with-Nonpar-Density-include/m-p/407642#M65771</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;They are different methods/perspectives by definitions. HDR only has two levels of rings for 50% and 99% to emphasize. One can certainly draw nonparametric density contour with 100 levels and spot the outer 1% in the last ring. Nonparametric density contour provides better sense about how the denseness gradually change from area to area, but does not emphasize what HDR does.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 16:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/why-doesn-t-the-2D-contours-graph-with-Nonpar-Density-include/m-p/407642#M65771</guid>
      <dc:creator>peng_liu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-06T16:20:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

