<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Firth-adjusted GLM logit regression and confidence intervals in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Firth-adjusted-GLM-logit-regression-and-confidence-intervals/m-p/395360#M64606</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I forgot to attach a screenshot. Here it is (it is in Italian)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 06:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Antony</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-23T06:42:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firth-adjusted GLM logit regression and confidence intervals</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Firth-adjusted-GLM-logit-regression-and-confidence-intervals/m-p/395355#M64605</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Goodmorning,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ran a logistic regression model, through a GLM with binomial distribution and logit link function, with Firth adjustment as I got a warning on quasi-separation of data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to assess if my variable of interest (CHIP) is associated to the outcome (I have a binary response variable), in a model adjusted for other covariates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, I run the model, and I get a parameter estimate with a significant p-value, but a confidence interval for the same estimate that is large enough to include the value 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My urgent question is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How should I interpret that? Can I make inferences or should I be more cautious?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ps. I know the model could be poorly fit, but that is the best I can do at the moment with the data I have&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:35:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Firth-adjusted-GLM-logit-regression-and-confidence-intervals/m-p/395355#M64605</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antony</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T00:35:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firth-adjusted GLM logit regression and confidence intervals</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Firth-adjusted-GLM-logit-regression-and-confidence-intervals/m-p/395360#M64606</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I forgot to attach a screenshot. Here it is (it is in Italian)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 06:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Firth-adjusted-GLM-logit-regression-and-confidence-intervals/m-p/395360#M64606</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antony</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-23T06:42:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firth-adjusted GLM logit regression and confidence intervals</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Firth-adjusted-GLM-logit-regression-and-confidence-intervals/m-p/395576#M64629</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;JMP help documentation tells us that these are profile-likelihood confidence intervals. I understand that you can expect some discrepancy between these and the ChiSquare p-values.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this case the discrepancy is not very big. The p-value for this effect is very close to 0.05 and your confidence intervals only just include 0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So while you might use the p-value &amp;lt; 0.05 to say that CHIP is "significant", you can't say that&amp;nbsp;the confidence intervals are telling you something completely different!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 16:45:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Firth-adjusted-GLM-logit-regression-and-confidence-intervals/m-p/395576#M64629</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phil_Kay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-23T16:45:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firth-adjusted GLM logit regression and confidence intervals</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Firth-adjusted-GLM-logit-regression-and-confidence-intervals/m-p/395585#M64633</link>
      <description>Thank you Phil, you really helped!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 18:32:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Firth-adjusted-GLM-logit-regression-and-confidence-intervals/m-p/395585#M64633</guid>
      <dc:creator>Antony</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-23T18:32:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

