<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How do I model A -&amp;gt; B -&amp;gt; C behavior? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-do-I-model-A-gt-B-gt-C-behavior/m-p/374749#M62451</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It sounds like both B and C are &lt;EM&gt;responses&lt;/EM&gt;, rather than being controlled directly.&amp;nbsp; If so, then would their measured values always be less than or equal to 100%? It seems like you might not need to introduce that constraint, and you could just try to maximize B and minimize C.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 19:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ih</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-06T19:43:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How do I model A -&gt; B -&gt; C behavior?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-do-I-model-A-gt-B-gt-C-behavior/m-p/374738#M62448</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I was wondering if anyone else has had this problem. We have a DoE custom design for evaluating factors to optimize for product "B" over an impurity, "C." C isn't independent of B - it's a byproduct which forms only upon B forming, that is A -&amp;gt; B-&amp;gt; C. I see how in Column Info one can set independent limits for responses A and B, but is there a way to set constraints such that B + C &amp;lt; 100%? Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 21:03:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-do-I-model-A-gt-B-gt-C-behavior/m-p/374738#M62448</guid>
      <dc:creator>JasonM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-08T21:03:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How do I model A -&gt; B -&gt; C behavior?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-do-I-model-A-gt-B-gt-C-behavior/m-p/374743#M62449</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure I understand completely, but here are my thoughts. &amp;nbsp;Seems you Have A &amp;gt; B + C? &amp;nbsp;In any case, you can add factors as &lt;STRONG&gt;mixture&lt;/STRONG&gt; factors and impose linear constraints.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 19:37:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-do-I-model-A-gt-B-gt-C-behavior/m-p/374743#M62449</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-06T19:37:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How do I model A -&gt; B -&gt; C behavior?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-do-I-model-A-gt-B-gt-C-behavior/m-p/374749#M62451</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It sounds like both B and C are &lt;EM&gt;responses&lt;/EM&gt;, rather than being controlled directly.&amp;nbsp; If so, then would their measured values always be less than or equal to 100%? It seems like you might not need to introduce that constraint, and you could just try to maximize B and minimize C.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 19:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-do-I-model-A-gt-B-gt-C-behavior/m-p/374749#M62451</guid>
      <dc:creator>ih</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-06T19:43:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

