<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: for analysis not possible in JMP in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/for-analysis-not-possible-in-JMP/m-p/374389#M62417</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;One advantage I can think of is the almost seamless integration of SAS and JMP in an organization's analytics workflow and ecosystem. Yes there is a JMP to R and back kind of integration as well...but it's no where near as elegant as the JMP to SAS and back bridge. After all, JMP is a SAS product so it's designed to play very nicely with SAS for just the types of situations you describe...where SAS has analytics capabilities not found natively in JMP products.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 13:48:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>P_Bartell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-05T13:48:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>for analysis not possible in JMP</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/for-analysis-not-possible-in-JMP/m-p/374336#M62415</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I feel like I have reached a stage where I have to do analysis which are not possible on JMP ( like doing a propensity matching, random effect for logistic regression, multiple imputation for categorical variables etc)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even though I love JMP and will continue to use it .. I need to learn another statistical program to perform analysis which is not possible in JMP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since it requires quite a bit of time investment in learning a new program have been trying to explore options. Readers of this forum are probably&amp;nbsp; biased but I want to bring up for discussion.. Which would be a better program to learn for somebody who is fairly competent in JMP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAS vs R&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been searching online and most of the reviews are mixed although it seems like people are preferring R more than SAS. For a JMP user would there be any advantage in using SAS versus R?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:31:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/for-analysis-not-possible-in-JMP/m-p/374336#M62415</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sandeep123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T00:31:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: for analysis not possible in JMP</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/for-analysis-not-possible-in-JMP/m-p/374389#M62417</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One advantage I can think of is the almost seamless integration of SAS and JMP in an organization's analytics workflow and ecosystem. Yes there is a JMP to R and back kind of integration as well...but it's no where near as elegant as the JMP to SAS and back bridge. After all, JMP is a SAS product so it's designed to play very nicely with SAS for just the types of situations you describe...where SAS has analytics capabilities not found natively in JMP products.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 13:48:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/for-analysis-not-possible-in-JMP/m-p/374389#M62417</guid>
      <dc:creator>P_Bartell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-05T13:48:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: for analysis not possible in JMP</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/for-analysis-not-possible-in-JMP/m-p/374454#M62426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/16828"&gt;@Sandeep123&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp; Have you had a chance to review this add-in&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Generalized-Linear-Mixed-Model-Add-in/ta-p/284627" target="_blank"&gt;Generalized Linear Mixed Model Add-in - JMP User Community&lt;/A&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From my perspective, JMP to R integration is very useful when I do work outside of JMP, but I do try to keep everything in the JSL file for documentation and reproducibility.&amp;nbsp; In the past I used SAS a bit, but found that R is more readily available in my field and so that governed my decision.&amp;nbsp; In my current role, I have access to SAS and find that, as Peter says, the JMP/SAS integration is very smooth.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 18:35:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/for-analysis-not-possible-in-JMP/m-p/374454#M62426</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-05T18:35:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: for analysis not possible in JMP</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/for-analysis-not-possible-in-JMP/m-p/374492#M62428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thank you. I did look at this add in. Haven't been able to work it the way I want so far...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 21:45:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/for-analysis-not-possible-in-JMP/m-p/374492#M62428</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sandeep123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-05T21:45:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

