<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: controlling for site clustering in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/controlling-for-site-clustering/m-p/366331#M61615</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, it sounds like a logistic regression model with covariates and site in the linear predictor is appropriate. You might also include cross terms for potential interaction effects such as length of stay at a particular site.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 10:31:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-09T10:31:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>controlling for site clustering</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/controlling-for-site-clustering/m-p/366301#M61607</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A large data set of &amp;gt;200,000 patients is from 125 hospitals. I am analyzing difference in outcomes ( mortality ( nominal) and Length of stay ( continuous) based on admission source. The other predictor variables include age, diagnostic categories, severity of illness score etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to account or site clustering. I can do this by adding site ID in the Fit model...I can make it into random effect also as I read on one of the discussion posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wanted to ensure this is appropriate method to account for the clustering. I will be doing linear regression by standard least square and nominal logistic regression.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you for looking into it&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/controlling-for-site-clustering/m-p/366301#M61607</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sandeep123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T00:30:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: controlling for site clustering</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/controlling-for-site-clustering/m-p/366331#M61615</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, it sounds like a logistic regression model with covariates and site in the linear predictor is appropriate. You might also include cross terms for potential interaction effects such as length of stay at a particular site.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 10:31:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/controlling-for-site-clustering/m-p/366331#M61615</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-09T10:31:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

