<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why the confidence interval from conditional prediction profiler has an irregular shape? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Why-the-confidence-interval-from-conditional-prediction-profiler/m-p/363955#M61360</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;There is various information on profilers built into JMP (&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/16.0/#page/jmp/profiler.shtml#" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/16.0/#page/jmp/profiler.shtml#&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Your model is not very good. &amp;nbsp;Have you analyzed the residuals? &amp;nbsp;There is evidence of non-constant variance and possibly multiple distribution of errors. &amp;nbsp;If you try removing some the effects from your model, you can watch the changes to the Rsquare-Rsquare adjusted delta and residual plots and subsequently the confidence curves.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 17:44:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-01T17:44:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why the confidence interval from conditional prediction profiler has an irregular shape?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Why-the-confidence-interval-from-conditional-prediction-profiler/m-p/363937#M61355</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to understand why the conditional prediction profiler from a mixed model has an irregular shape.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here I attached a dataset with 1 responses, and you will see the irregular shape of the CIs in conditional prediction profiler&amp;nbsp;from a&amp;nbsp;mixed model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:29:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Why-the-confidence-interval-from-conditional-prediction-profiler/m-p/363937#M61355</guid>
      <dc:creator>YangHong</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T00:29:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why the confidence interval from conditional prediction profiler has an irregular shape?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Why-the-confidence-interval-from-conditional-prediction-profiler/m-p/363955#M61360</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is various information on profilers built into JMP (&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/16.0/#page/jmp/profiler.shtml#" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/16.0/#page/jmp/profiler.shtml#&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Your model is not very good. &amp;nbsp;Have you analyzed the residuals? &amp;nbsp;There is evidence of non-constant variance and possibly multiple distribution of errors. &amp;nbsp;If you try removing some the effects from your model, you can watch the changes to the Rsquare-Rsquare adjusted delta and residual plots and subsequently the confidence curves.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 17:44:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Why-the-confidence-interval-from-conditional-prediction-profiler/m-p/363955#M61360</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-01T17:44:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why the confidence interval from conditional prediction profiler has an irregular shape?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Why-the-confidence-interval-from-conditional-prediction-profiler/m-p/363977#M61365</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/25111"&gt;@YangHong&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; I would also add that it is not that common to have a two-factor interaction be more important than a main effect. It certainly can happen, but if the DOE is designed to look at the right factors, the main effects will almost always show more importance than two-factor interactions, which is related the the concepts of effect hierarchy and effect heredity. You can read more about it &lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/15.2/index.shtml#page/jmp/principles-and-guidelines-for-experimental-design.shtml" target="_self"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DS&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 18:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Why-the-confidence-interval-from-conditional-prediction-profiler/m-p/363977#M61365</guid>
      <dc:creator>SDF1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-01T18:28:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

