<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic JMP Genomics - ANOVA vs deseq2 in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-Genomics-ANOVA-vs-deseq2/m-p/358155#M60827</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello there. I am new to both JMP Genomics and RNA-Seq data analysis. It appears that JMP Genomics 10 implements ANOVA as a means to determine differential gene expression data. However, that vast majority of RNA-Seq gene expression studies use deseq2 or similar R packages. Has anyone done a comparison (or know of a published report) comparing the two methods? What are the pros and cons?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Follow up ... Is there any way to implement deseq2 in JMP Genomics?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 20:43:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LouisAltamura</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-10T20:43:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>JMP Genomics - ANOVA vs deseq2</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-Genomics-ANOVA-vs-deseq2/m-p/358155#M60827</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello there. I am new to both JMP Genomics and RNA-Seq data analysis. It appears that JMP Genomics 10 implements ANOVA as a means to determine differential gene expression data. However, that vast majority of RNA-Seq gene expression studies use deseq2 or similar R packages. Has anyone done a comparison (or know of a published report) comparing the two methods? What are the pros and cons?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Follow up ... Is there any way to implement deseq2 in JMP Genomics?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 20:43:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-Genomics-ANOVA-vs-deseq2/m-p/358155#M60827</guid>
      <dc:creator>LouisAltamura</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-10T20:43:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: JMP Genomics - ANOVA vs deseq2</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-Genomics-ANOVA-vs-deseq2/m-p/358185#M60833</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/18997"&gt;@LouisAltamura&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am not aware of anyone publishing the difference. I can tell you that ANOVA in JMP G can deal with multiple factors, interactions, nesting and random factors as well as baseline covariates as precursors to differential expression. Something Deseq2 cannot do well or without a lot of work. Also is the interactive nature of the outputs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They are equivalent in results when looking at similar basic experimental designs. Both use either negative binomial for counts or log2 for transforming data (variance stabilization).&amp;nbsp; Both can perform Multiple Test Correction methods like Benjamini-Hochberg FDR corrections. There might be some deviation with some options, but they are subtle from what I can tell in regards to the results.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Biggest difference: Coding vs. Point and Click interface&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Another related difference: Perceived free (but takes a person time and thus money in order to code) vs. Cost of buying software (but no coding needed)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;Since JMP Genomics is based on JMP, one can easily connect to a local copy of R and write JSL to make the connection, invoke Deseq2, and return results back to JMP G/JMP for interactive visualizations. Even provide custom interfaces for non-coders. We have created add-ins for situations like this in Expression/Genetics (&lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/JMP-Genomics-QuasR-Alignment-add-in/ta-p/36941" target="_self"&gt;QuasR Alignment&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Data-visualization-with-t-SNE-and-UMAP/ta-p/177969" target="_self"&gt;Embedding&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Genomic-Bayesian-Methods-Add-in-for-JMP-Genomics/ta-p/186399" target="_self"&gt;Genomic Bayesian Regression&lt;/A&gt;, and &lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Outcross-Linkage-Map-Analyses-Add-in-for-JMP-Genomics/ta-p/22530" target="_self"&gt;Outcross Linkage Maps&lt;/A&gt;) and Predictive Modeling&amp;nbsp;(&lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/XGBoost-Add-In-for-JMP-Pro/ta-p/319383" target="_self"&gt;XGBoost&lt;/A&gt;) in JMP Pro/JMP Genomics either connecting to R or Python.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:48:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JMP-Genomics-ANOVA-vs-deseq2/m-p/358185#M60833</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Kirchberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-11T16:48:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

