<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why does &amp;quot;Link to original data table&amp;quot; selection remove values in formulated columns in the created subset? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Why-does-quot-Link-to-original-data-table-quot-selection-remove/m-p/283943#M54858</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a question about subsetting a data table.&amp;nbsp; When I created a subset which included some columns with formulas "+", I initially checked off the selection "Link to original data table" for the new subset I was creating.&amp;nbsp; After this was done, any column from the original data table subsetted into the new data table that had a formula associated with it showed no data at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I went back to experiment and created more data tables only changing the bottom selections:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subset 1 - selected "link to original data table"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subset 2 - selected "copy formula"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subset 3 - selected both "copy formula" and "suppress formula evaluation"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In subsets 2 and 3 the data from columns with formulas was correctly transcribed into the new subsets. No differences.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is - why do the formulated columns' data not transcribe to the new subset when "link to original data table" is selected?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 23:17:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ChristinaF</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-10T23:17:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why does "Link to original data table" selection remove values in formulated columns in the created subset?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Why-does-quot-Link-to-original-data-table-quot-selection-remove/m-p/283943#M54858</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a question about subsetting a data table.&amp;nbsp; When I created a subset which included some columns with formulas "+", I initially checked off the selection "Link to original data table" for the new subset I was creating.&amp;nbsp; After this was done, any column from the original data table subsetted into the new data table that had a formula associated with it showed no data at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I went back to experiment and created more data tables only changing the bottom selections:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subset 1 - selected "link to original data table"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subset 2 - selected "copy formula"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subset 3 - selected both "copy formula" and "suppress formula evaluation"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In subsets 2 and 3 the data from columns with formulas was correctly transcribed into the new subsets. No differences.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is - why do the formulated columns' data not transcribe to the new subset when "link to original data table" is selected?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 23:17:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Why-does-quot-Link-to-original-data-table-quot-selection-remove/m-p/283943#M54858</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChristinaF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-10T23:17:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does "Link to original data table" selection remove values in formulated columns in the created subset?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Why-does-quot-Link-to-original-data-table-quot-selection-remove/m-p/284325#M54925</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are there values in the original table for the exact rows you refer to in the subset table?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With link to original table checked I believe the values calculated in original table are displayed in the subset table, so from my experience if a value is missing in the subset table it is also missing in the original table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you post an example of your issue?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:40:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Why-does-quot-Link-to-original-data-table-quot-selection-remove/m-p/284325#M54925</guid>
      <dc:creator>ih</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-05T18:40:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

