<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Omega hierarchical (reliability) in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/281942#M54560</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Laura,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the info.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;obtain the coefficient omega using the early adopter but I cannot find it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please could you provide indications about where to find it in the program?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 22:28:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Fernando</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-07-24T22:28:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Omega hierarchical (reliability)</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/253569#M49780</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My snobby psychometrics colleagues don't like alpha (even though it's used 98% of the time), because one can get a high alpha even if one has no general factor. Omega (hierarchical; not general) is the solution. I am writing to plea for consideration for future JMP (or if anyone is sufficiently challenged, an add-in). Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 21:54:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/253569#M49780</guid>
      <dc:creator>profjmb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-21T21:54:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Omega hierarchical (reliability)</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/253571#M49781</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Make sure you submit the request to the JMP Wish List?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 22:09:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/253571#M49781</guid>
      <dc:creator>txnelson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-21T22:09:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Omega hierarchical (reliability)</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/253827#M49840</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6029"&gt;@profjmb&lt;/a&gt;!&amp;nbsp; It's a great suggestion. I just added it to our to-do list. We'll eventually get to it!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;~Laura&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:42:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/253827#M49840</guid>
      <dc:creator>LauraCS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-23T16:42:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Omega hierarchical (reliability)</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/271575#M52870</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6029"&gt;@profjmb&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I just wanted to let you know that JMP 16.0 will have an option to obtain coefficient omega from a CFA. Whether users obtain omega hierarchical or general will depend of the type of CFA that was fit. For example, a standard CFA with 3 factors would result in omega_general for subscales. However, if such CFA is extended to a bifactor model (by adding a general factor that loads on all manifest variables), the result will be omega_hierarchical for the general factor and omega_hierarchical for subscales for the group factors. This follows the review of omega coefficients in&amp;nbsp;Rodriguez, Reise, &amp;amp; Haviland (2015). These options are available in the Early Adopter program so we'll keep improving them as we receive feedback.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you again for your suggestion!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;~Laura&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:36:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/271575#M52870</guid>
      <dc:creator>LauraCS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-09T13:36:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Omega hierarchical (reliability)</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/281942#M54560</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Laura,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the info.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;obtain the coefficient omega using the early adopter but I cannot find it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please could you provide indications about where to find it in the program?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 22:28:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/281942#M54560</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fernando</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-24T22:28:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Omega hierarchical (reliability)</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/282149#M54604</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/19820"&gt;@Fernando&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We included coefficient omega as part of a "mini dashboard" of related statistics that quantify the adequacy of the measurement model at hand, thus, you'll find it in under the red triangle menu for a fitted model as, "Assess Measurement Model."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;~Laura&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 11:48:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Omega-hierarchical-reliability/m-p/282149#M54604</guid>
      <dc:creator>LauraCS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-27T11:48:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

