<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to compare paired data sets include the variation on the samples in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-compare-paired-data-sets-include-the-variation-on-the/m-p/273032#M53101</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What is this study, an analytical method comparison? An equivalence study for instrument replacement? Is one of the methods a reference? What do you mean by, "&lt;SPAN&gt;So now I want to compare method 1 vs 2 including the know variation to see if statistically significant?&lt;/SPAN&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Your data is pre-summarized, so you you could use Bivariate platform with the mean and then select Fit Orthogonal to compare the null hypothesis of an intercept = 0 and a slope = 1.&amp;nbsp;You could use Matched Pairs platform if you are looking for a difference in the mean.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would recommend that you include the individual replicate measurements instead of summarizing the data into the mean and standard deviation.&amp;nbsp;You could use a Fit Least Squares after stacking the measurement columns. The measurement in the Y role and then enter Sample as a random effect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hard to say much more given we know practically nothing about your study, your intentions, or your needs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:54:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-16T14:54:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to compare paired data sets include the variation on the samples</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-compare-paired-data-sets-include-the-variation-on-the/m-p/273016#M53099</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Feeling i meeting the wall with comparing these two methods I'm testing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 2 methods (1 and 2) both analysed on the same sample. For both methods triplicates have been measured for each sample. So now I want to compare method 1 vs 2 including the know variation to see if statistically significant?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 00:17:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-compare-paired-data-sets-include-the-variation-on-the/m-p/273016#M53099</guid>
      <dc:creator>ANLUN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T00:17:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to compare paired data sets include the variation on the samples</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-compare-paired-data-sets-include-the-variation-on-the/m-p/273032#M53101</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is this study, an analytical method comparison? An equivalence study for instrument replacement? Is one of the methods a reference? What do you mean by, "&lt;SPAN&gt;So now I want to compare method 1 vs 2 including the know variation to see if statistically significant?&lt;/SPAN&gt;"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Your data is pre-summarized, so you you could use Bivariate platform with the mean and then select Fit Orthogonal to compare the null hypothesis of an intercept = 0 and a slope = 1.&amp;nbsp;You could use Matched Pairs platform if you are looking for a difference in the mean.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would recommend that you include the individual replicate measurements instead of summarizing the data into the mean and standard deviation.&amp;nbsp;You could use a Fit Least Squares after stacking the measurement columns. The measurement in the Y role and then enter Sample as a random effect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hard to say much more given we know practically nothing about your study, your intentions, or your needs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:54:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-compare-paired-data-sets-include-the-variation-on-the/m-p/273032#M53101</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-16T14:54:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to compare paired data sets include the variation on the samples</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-compare-paired-data-sets-include-the-variation-on-the/m-p/273091#M53109</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/19302"&gt;@ANLUN&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if you are looking for inspiration from the variety of options for method comparison try this add in:&amp;nbsp;&lt;LI-MESSAGE title="Method Comparison" uid="21520" url="https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Method-Comparison/m-p/21520#U21520" discussion_style_icon_css="lia-mention-container-editor-message lia-img-icon-tkb-thread lia-fa-icon lia-fa-tkb lia-fa-thread lia-fa"&gt;&lt;/LI-MESSAGE&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Otherwise, we would need to know much more before being able to help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:28:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-compare-paired-data-sets-include-the-variation-on-the/m-p/273091#M53109</guid>
      <dc:creator>ron_horne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-17T12:28:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

