<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Custom DOE do 3 replicates of each combination in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Custom-DOE-do-3-replicates-of-each-combination/m-p/270938#M52737</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Replicates runs just makes one of your run conditions repeated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It sounds like you plan to repeat your 20 runs 3 times?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this case just add a column for each repeat. From here you have some decisions to make about repeated measures.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example: I have 20 conditions I want to try and I'm running the experiment in a 96 well microtiter plate, so its easy to have repeats of the 20 conditions, plus I know there might be random position effects, so repeats are a good idea.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are all 60 well independent runs? Well, no. They are all dependent on the one run. After I have all the data I would likely take the mean of the three repeats and use that as the response in my analysis of the experiment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Byron_JMP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-05T13:11:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Custom DOE do 3 replicates of each combination</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Custom-DOE-do-3-replicates-of-each-combination/m-p/270921#M52735</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm trying out the custom DOE tool and I'm not sure what the replicate runs option does.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to specify that I want 20 combinations for example but I was to run each of those combinations 3 times, so we have 3 replicates of each combination and 60 runs in total.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would be the best way to do this?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 20:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Custom-DOE-do-3-replicates-of-each-combination/m-p/270921#M52735</guid>
      <dc:creator>Agustin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-08T20:58:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Custom DOE do 3 replicates of each combination</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Custom-DOE-do-3-replicates-of-each-combination/m-p/270938#M52737</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Replicates runs just makes one of your run conditions repeated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It sounds like you plan to repeat your 20 runs 3 times?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this case just add a column for each repeat. From here you have some decisions to make about repeated measures.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example: I have 20 conditions I want to try and I'm running the experiment in a 96 well microtiter plate, so its easy to have repeats of the 20 conditions, plus I know there might be random position effects, so repeats are a good idea.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are all 60 well independent runs? Well, no. They are all dependent on the one run. After I have all the data I would likely take the mean of the three repeats and use that as the response in my analysis of the experiment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Custom-DOE-do-3-replicates-of-each-combination/m-p/270938#M52737</guid>
      <dc:creator>Byron_JMP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-05T13:11:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Custom DOE do 3 replicates of each combination</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Custom-DOE-do-3-replicates-of-each-combination/m-p/270950#M52739</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To add my thoughts to the discussion, repeats capture short-term effects not due to the treatments. &amp;nbsp;This can be useful for being able to analyze measurement error or within treatment variation (due to the sources of variation changing between repeats). &amp;nbsp;This data would need to be summarized to evaluate the treatments as repeats do not increase the degrees of freedom available. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Replication is a method to capture (and possibly assign) long-term variation due to "noise" so that you can:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. determine if the results of the treatments from one replicate repeat for other replicates thereby increasing the inference space of the experiment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. determine the size of the noise between replicates&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. increase the precision of detecting treatment effects while not compromising inference space&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. determine oil your results are robust to noise.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:31:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Custom-DOE-do-3-replicates-of-each-combination/m-p/270950#M52739</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-05T13:31:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

