<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Two-way ANOVA with non-normal data and heterogeneity of variances in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Two-way-ANOVA-with-non-normal-data-and-heterogeneity-of/m-p/269207#M52412</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It sounds like you're not sure how to account for time, or change over time in your model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What are you doing with Month? is it a random effect? how are you accounting for change over time in your model?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The second variable is your treatment (community?)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In fit model, maybe your effects are: &amp;nbsp;(or instead of month, days since start, or something that makes sense in you experiment.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;community&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;month &amp;amp; Random&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;month*community &amp;amp; Random&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then you can do a custom test, or multiple comparisons (red triangle, estimates, multiple comparisons.) &amp;nbsp;to get the least squares means for each community.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After the analysis, check your residuals for normality. The dispersion in your experimental responses may be explained by the treatments and random effects?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 18:42:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Byron_JMP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-27T18:42:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Two-way ANOVA with non-normal data and heterogeneity of variances</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Two-way-ANOVA-with-non-normal-data-and-heterogeneity-of/m-p/49886#M28367</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear friends of data analysis!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm struggling with the data for my thesis - I want to do two-way anovas, but my data is non-normally distributed and shows no homogeneity of variances.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My data was collected monthly over a one-year period, with 4 data points per month (respectively for the below-mentioned variables) per treatment (of which I have two) = ~ 48 data points per treatment, ~96 in total.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have different variables I want to test: Biodiversity (Shannon and Simpson Indices), Ethylene production and Primary productivity.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My original two-way anova model is (e.g.) Shannon ~ Community*Time&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Transformations of the data did not lead to a fulfillment of the assumptions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to do a non-parametric test with JMP, but to not only test one-way (e.g. Shannon~Community, Shannon~Time), but also the interaction term?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What other alternatives can you suggest?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I tried a GLM with JMP, but the distributions (binomial, normal, exponential, poisson) do not seem to be well-suited for my data... I tried Poisson, but then I have problems with the overdispersion (when to select it and when not?)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope to find some help here, thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Franka&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:40:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Two-way-ANOVA-with-non-normal-data-and-heterogeneity-of/m-p/49886#M28367</guid>
      <dc:creator>frankyfroo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-19T18:40:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alternative two-way anova</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Two-way-ANOVA-with-non-normal-data-and-heterogeneity-of/m-p/49978#M28430</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is tricky because you don't really escape the equal variances assumption by going non-parametric.&amp;nbsp; Some non-parametrics don't&amp;nbsp;assume equal variance, some do.&amp;nbsp; You could collapse the 2 factors into 1 and do a Welch's ANOVA.&amp;nbsp; This is like testing the 2 main effects and the interaction simultaneously.&amp;nbsp; Problem is you won't be able to test each factor for significance separately.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, there is not a good followup test in JMP like Tukey HSD to look at all pairwise comparisons that also has a Behrens-Fisher adjustment to account for unequal variances.&amp;nbsp; There is a test called Games-Howell that is basically a Welch's Tukey HSD, but you'd have to use R&amp;nbsp;or SAS for that analysis.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JMP does have Steel-Dwass, which I believe is a type of permutation test.&amp;nbsp; I've never had much luck with it because my group sizes were too small.&amp;nbsp; With your sample sizes, you would probably be ok using that method.&amp;nbsp; I'm just not sure how robust it is to unequal variances.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Non-parametric 2-way ANOVA is Friedman's Test, but that is not currently in JMP.&amp;nbsp; There is a discussion here: &lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Friedman-test-on-JMP/td-p/5974" target="_self"&gt;https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Friedman-test-on-JMP/td-p/5974&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Non-normality is not much of an issue for you because you have a large sample size for each treatment.&amp;nbsp; CLT kicks in by n=30 for most situations, and the real assumption for ANOVA is that the sampling distributions of the means are normally distributed.&amp;nbsp; Your bigger problem is the unequal variances.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:23:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Two-way-ANOVA-with-non-normal-data-and-heterogeneity-of/m-p/49978#M28430</guid>
      <dc:creator>cwillden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-22T21:23:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two-way ANOVA with non-normal data and heterogeneity of variances</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Two-way-ANOVA-with-non-normal-data-and-heterogeneity-of/m-p/269207#M52412</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It sounds like you're not sure how to account for time, or change over time in your model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What are you doing with Month? is it a random effect? how are you accounting for change over time in your model?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The second variable is your treatment (community?)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In fit model, maybe your effects are: &amp;nbsp;(or instead of month, days since start, or something that makes sense in you experiment.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;community&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;month &amp;amp; Random&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;month*community &amp;amp; Random&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then you can do a custom test, or multiple comparisons (red triangle, estimates, multiple comparisons.) &amp;nbsp;to get the least squares means for each community.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After the analysis, check your residuals for normality. The dispersion in your experimental responses may be explained by the treatments and random effects?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 18:42:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Two-way-ANOVA-with-non-normal-data-and-heterogeneity-of/m-p/269207#M52412</guid>
      <dc:creator>Byron_JMP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-27T18:42:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

