<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to perform MANOVA with continuous variables which are not normally distributed (non-parametric) in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-perform-MANOVA-with-continuous-variables-which-are-not/m-p/265726#M51753</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I suggest that you proceed with your analysis and check the residuals for anomalies before choosing another method of analysis.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 13:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-11T13:27:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to perform MANOVA with continuous variables which are not normally distributed (non-parametric)</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-perform-MANOVA-with-continuous-variables-which-are-not/m-p/265648#M51730</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am performing an analysis of hemoglobin values at 3 different time points between cases and controls. The data is not normally distributed. How should I go about with MANOVA in such a setting? Also is there an alternative test that I can apply in JMP to see the differences in the cases &amp;amp; controls at these 3-time points.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 05:58:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-perform-MANOVA-with-continuous-variables-which-are-not/m-p/265648#M51730</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uday</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-11T05:58:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to perform MANOVA with continuous variables which are not normally distributed (non-parametric)</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-perform-MANOVA-with-continuous-variables-which-are-not/m-p/265687#M51742</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How are you assessing normality? Are you assessing the response itself? The predictors?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 11:22:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-perform-MANOVA-with-continuous-variables-which-are-not/m-p/265687#M51742</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-11T11:22:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to perform MANOVA with continuous variables which are not normally distributed (non-parametric)</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-perform-MANOVA-with-continuous-variables-which-are-not/m-p/265704#M51747</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently I had analyzed normalcy using the goodness of fit by Shapiro-Wilk test for Y variable at each time point. In my case, the distribution is not normal (p is significant in the Shapiro-Wilk test). In a situation where even at a one-time point (among the 3-time points) the distribution is abnormal, I am presuming to apply a nonparametric test.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure if this is the right way of looking at the normalcy or evaluating the differences in cases and controls over the 3-time points. Please suggest.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 13:00:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-perform-MANOVA-with-continuous-variables-which-are-not/m-p/265704#M51747</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uday</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-11T13:00:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to perform MANOVA with continuous variables which are not normally distributed (non-parametric)</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-perform-MANOVA-with-continuous-variables-which-are-not/m-p/265726#M51753</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I suggest that you proceed with your analysis and check the residuals for anomalies before choosing another method of analysis.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 13:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-perform-MANOVA-with-continuous-variables-which-are-not/m-p/265726#M51753</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-11T13:27:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to perform MANOVA with continuous variables which are not normally distributed (non-parametric)</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-perform-MANOVA-with-continuous-variables-which-are-not/m-p/265756#M51763</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ANOVA is fairly robust to the underlying distribution of the individual values. &amp;nbsp;As Mark suggests, go ahead with your analysis and then check residuals for assumptions NID(0, variance).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 14:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-perform-MANOVA-with-continuous-variables-which-are-not/m-p/265756#M51763</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-11T14:48:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

