<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249833#M49059</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If you also want to estimate the common intercept, try this approach.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Select &lt;STRONG&gt;Analyze &amp;gt; Fit Model&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Click the red triangle at the top left and de-select &lt;STRONG&gt;Center Polynomials&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Select the &lt;STRONG&gt;response&lt;/STRONG&gt; column and click &lt;STRONG&gt;Y&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Select the &lt;STRONG&gt;time and group&lt;/STRONG&gt; columns and click &lt;STRONG&gt;Macros&lt;/STRONG&gt;, then select &lt;STRONG&gt;Factorial to Degree&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Select the &lt;STRONG&gt;group effect&lt;/STRONG&gt; and click &lt;STRONG&gt;Remove&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;JMP will ask you to if it should remove all terms with this column. Click &lt;STRONG&gt;No&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Click &lt;STRONG&gt;Run&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;JMP will warn you about a missing effect. Click &lt;STRONG&gt;Continue&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In general, we would keep the group effect in the model to maintain the &lt;EM&gt;model hierarchy&lt;/EM&gt;. But that leads to a unique or different intercept for each group. This way you will get estimates and tests for the common intercept and unique group slopes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 17:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-29T17:57:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249804#M49054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi - i am unsure how to fit a regression model with different slopes BUT a common Interecpt.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Assume Y=response, GROUP (2-levels),&amp;nbsp; TIme (Covariate)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards, Vince&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:03:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249804#M49054</guid>
      <dc:creator>vincem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T11:03:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249811#M49055</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can do this in Fit Y by X:&amp;nbsp; Y=response, X=time.&amp;nbsp; After the plot, Group by GROUP.&amp;nbsp; Then use Fit Special and constrain the intercept to 0.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249811#M49055</guid>
      <dc:creator>dale_lehman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T13:40:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249817#M49057</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1701"&gt;@dale_lehman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Cool!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Male and Female groups have same intercept" style="width: 410px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/21992iAFB62FE274ADC1EA/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Capture.PNG" alt="Male and Female groups have same intercept" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;Male and Female groups have same intercept&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 14:03:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249817#M49057</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craige_Hales</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T14:03:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249833#M49059</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you also want to estimate the common intercept, try this approach.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Select &lt;STRONG&gt;Analyze &amp;gt; Fit Model&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Click the red triangle at the top left and de-select &lt;STRONG&gt;Center Polynomials&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Select the &lt;STRONG&gt;response&lt;/STRONG&gt; column and click &lt;STRONG&gt;Y&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Select the &lt;STRONG&gt;time and group&lt;/STRONG&gt; columns and click &lt;STRONG&gt;Macros&lt;/STRONG&gt;, then select &lt;STRONG&gt;Factorial to Degree&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Select the &lt;STRONG&gt;group effect&lt;/STRONG&gt; and click &lt;STRONG&gt;Remove&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;JMP will ask you to if it should remove all terms with this column. Click &lt;STRONG&gt;No&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Click &lt;STRONG&gt;Run&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;JMP will warn you about a missing effect. Click &lt;STRONG&gt;Continue&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In general, we would keep the group effect in the model to maintain the &lt;EM&gt;model hierarchy&lt;/EM&gt;. But that leads to a unique or different intercept for each group. This way you will get estimates and tests for the common intercept and unique group slopes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 17:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249833#M49059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T17:57:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249844#M49061</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks! I made up 40 because it looked good (better than zero, anyway).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;edit: adding an image. Left is fit y by x, center is fit model. Right is illustrating how to get the slopes from fit model.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5358"&gt;@Mark_Bailey&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Getting the slopes from Fit Model" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/21993i1C3F23B42C5F1FA5/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Capture.PNG" alt="Getting the slopes from Fit Model" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;Getting the slopes from Fit Model&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 20:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249844#M49061</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craige_Hales</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T20:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249859#M49062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thansk...however when i adopt the below approach the graph of Y verus TIME by group - doesnt appear to haev a common intercept. Howevre if i change Time to an ordinal variable..seems to work OK.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 22:39:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249859#M49062</guid>
      <dc:creator>vincem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T22:39:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249860#M49063</link>
      <description>Thanks...curious to knnow if there is an alternative way without this to stage process..</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 22:42:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249860#M49063</guid>
      <dc:creator>vincem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T22:42:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249861#M49064</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Fit model does give the intercept and the two slopes in a single step. The picture is comparing the easy-to-read output in fit y by x with the parameters returned by fit model. I puzzled it out by comparing them; I hope &lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5358"&gt;@Mark_Bailey&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; is watching in case I've misinterpreted something.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 22:53:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249861#M49064</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craige_Hales</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T22:53:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249864#M49065</link>
      <description>Thanks - how did you estimate the common intercept using fit y by x of 49?.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Feb 2020 23:50:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249864#M49065</guid>
      <dc:creator>vincem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-29T23:50:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249865#M49066</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I copied it from fit model to&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1701"&gt;@dale_lehman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;answer, instead of the zero he suggested or the 40 I initially guessed. If you start with fit model rather than fit y by x, you get parameters for both lines without copying the numbers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2020 00:08:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249865#M49066</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craige_Hales</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-01T00:08:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249879#M49068</link>
      <description>Thanks - so I assume fit model implementation is required to get the common intercept and slopes first then fit by x to get the figure. Thanks for your help . Appreciate it</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2020 02:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249879#M49068</guid>
      <dc:creator>vincem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-01T02:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249902#M49074</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here is another approach, using the Nonlinear platform.&amp;nbsp; Attached is an example:&amp;nbsp; you need to set parameters to be solved for, with a single intercept but varying slope parameters for the two groups.&amp;nbsp; The script is saved for the solution.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2020 14:31:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249902#M49074</guid>
      <dc:creator>dale_lehman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-01T14:31:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249915#M49079</link>
      <description>thanks much appreciated.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2020 19:32:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/249915#M49079</guid>
      <dc:creator>vincem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-01T19:32:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fitting Different Slopes Common Intercepts</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/747282#M92738</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;on here appreciating this older tip about using Fit Model by not centering polynomials and just thought I'd note that in Fit Model the Expanded Estimates are a little less cryptic, especially if there were more groups.&amp;nbsp; I'll be using those where I want to get the slopes out of there with JSL but can see that the plot from Fit Y by X is nicer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="hardner_0-1713278170818.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/63385iEAEF8A3A8A83E863/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="hardner_0-1713278170818.png" alt="hardner_0-1713278170818.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:38:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fitting-Different-Slopes-Common-Intercepts/m-p/747282#M92738</guid>
      <dc:creator>hardner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-16T14:38:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

