<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multiple responses and multiple predictors in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multiple-responses-and-multiple-predictors/m-p/245749#M48282</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If you want to model all the responses simultaneously, not individually, then consider using PLS or neural network. If you want to model individual responses, then you might first use Analyze &amp;gt; Screening &amp;gt; Response Screening and Predictor Screening to explore possible relationships.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 12:57:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-04T12:57:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple responses and multiple predictors</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multiple-responses-and-multiple-predictors/m-p/245656#M48277</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know which is the best tecnique to model a set of data with multiple responses Yi and multiple predictors X.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried the fit model option but the results are not so good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BY using the PCA I was able to reduce the Y responses&amp;nbsp; from ~50 at ~10. Still a high number.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds.&amp;nbsp; Felice . .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 10:18:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multiple-responses-and-multiple-predictors/m-p/245656#M48277</guid>
      <dc:creator>FR60</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-04T10:18:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple responses and multiple predictors</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multiple-responses-and-multiple-predictors/m-p/245659#M48278</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You seem to be asking two questions: modeling techniques and dimension reduction. The PCA result does not seem like a lot of predictors to me. Why is ~10 still too large?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There are many modeling techniques for such a case. Are you building an explanatory model or a predictive model? The former is about estimating and testing parameters, such as a design experiment. The latter is about estimating the response, as in machine learning and AI.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What do you mean when you say, "&lt;SPAN&gt;I tried the fit model option but the results are not so good.&lt;/SPAN&gt;" What were you expecting? Why were you disappointed? What was lacking?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you trying to model multiple responses independently? That is, each response is modeled with its own model. If not, how are the responses related?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 10:49:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multiple-responses-and-multiple-predictors/m-p/245659#M48278</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-04T10:49:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple responses and multiple predictors</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multiple-responses-and-multiple-predictors/m-p/245744#M48281</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ciao Mark thanks for your input.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the PCA I was referring to Y responses and not to predictors X.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Generally I prefer to work with few responses, for this reason I said that 10 for me was still large.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm building an explanatory model by using production data. In other words I want to check if exist any relationship betweens the X predictors and the multiple responses Y.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;About the fit model I was saiyng that results were not good due to low Rsquare (&amp;lt;5%) and high pval (0.18).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm triyng to model all the responses togheter. No collinarity for them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you suggesting to run as many models as there are responses Y?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Felice&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 12:50:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multiple-responses-and-multiple-predictors/m-p/245744#M48281</guid>
      <dc:creator>FR60</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-04T12:50:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple responses and multiple predictors</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multiple-responses-and-multiple-predictors/m-p/245749#M48282</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you want to model all the responses simultaneously, not individually, then consider using PLS or neural network. If you want to model individual responses, then you might first use Analyze &amp;gt; Screening &amp;gt; Response Screening and Predictor Screening to explore possible relationships.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 12:57:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multiple-responses-and-multiple-predictors/m-p/245749#M48282</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-04T12:57:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

