<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Analysis of means (ANOM) decision limits for log transformed data glitch [fit curve] in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241824#M47772</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I do not see any obvious problem with either the data or the model. I would report this issue to JMP Technical Support (&lt;A href="mailto:support@jmp.com" target="_blank"&gt;support@jmp.com&lt;/A&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please report back with your findings!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 21:52:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-17T21:52:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis of means (ANOM) decision limits for log transformed data glitch [fit curve]</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241761#M47757</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am doing some fit curve work on log transformed mortality data using 2 parameter probit and am super confused as to why the upper and lower limits are the same value for this log transformed dataset when comparing using an ANOM:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="joemama985_0-1579277052689.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/21032i92E3E1F8748B9192/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="joemama985_0-1579277052689.png" alt="joemama985_0-1579277052689.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I run this on the same data untransformed I get appropriate limits for a comparison. is this a glitch or am I doing something wrong?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 16:08:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241761#M47757</guid>
      <dc:creator>joemama985</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-17T16:08:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Analysis of means (ANOM) decision limits for log transformed data glitch [fit curve]</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241777#M47762</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is possible that there is an error. I do not have your data so I cannot confirm your observation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I used &lt;STRONG&gt;weight&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;height&lt;/STRONG&gt; in Big Class data table to fit a Exponential 2P model for each &lt;STRONG&gt;age&lt;/STRONG&gt;. I compared the estimates:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Capture 1.JPG" style="width: 608px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/21033i3E26F2AAA5E40EE3/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Capture 1.JPG" alt="Capture 1.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I applied the &lt;STRONG&gt;Log()&lt;/STRONG&gt; function to the &lt;STRONG&gt;weight&lt;/STRONG&gt; and repeated my analysis:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Capture 2.JPG" style="width: 620px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/21034i27B185D5C6AD7614/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Capture 2.JPG" alt="Capture 2.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The transformation changed the scale and shape as expected. My simple trial does not seem to replicate the problem that you see.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you show us the same plot as below for the fits to your data using the original response and the transformed response?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Capture 3.JPG" style="width: 449px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/21035i3344C48CA7B44305/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Capture 3.JPG" alt="Capture 3.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 17:48:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241777#M47762</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-17T17:48:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Analysis of means (ANOM) decision limits for log transformed data glitch [fit curve]</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241805#M47766</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="joemama985_0-1579294426921.png" style="width: 900px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/21043i8198DD9C59359144/image-dimensions/900x455?v=v2" width="900" height="455" role="button" title="joemama985_0-1579294426921.png" alt="joemama985_0-1579294426921.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the side by side. I am comparing a dose response, so the dose needs to be log transformed (standard practice). To give you some background. I am trying to compare the ld50's between GLM-Binomial-Probit vs running Probit 2P on the ratio vs. Dose.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate any suggestions you may have.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 21:09:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241805#M47766</guid>
      <dc:creator>joemama985</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-17T21:09:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Analysis of means (ANOM) decision limits for log transformed data glitch [fit curve]</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241816#M47769</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, those plots are helpful. They clearly show the discrepency in the decision limits!&amp;nbsp;But I wonder if you could show the same plots as I gave above with the standard curve data and fits (overlaid and individual)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We might be able to solve your problem without going to JMP Technical Support.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 21:38:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241816#M47769</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-17T21:38:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Analysis of means (ANOM) decision limits for log transformed data glitch [fit curve]</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241823#M47771</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="joemama985_0-1579297502811.png" style="width: 811px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/21047iB89C8D1F55BDAB6D/image-dimensions/811x430?v=v2" width="811" height="430" role="button" title="joemama985_0-1579297502811.png" alt="joemama985_0-1579297502811.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="joemama985_1-1579297549982.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/21048iBB1C071F6C96B863/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="joemama985_1-1579297549982.png" alt="joemama985_1-1579297549982.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is the formula I am using as the Y. It is the prediction formula generated by the GLM analysis&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 21:46:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241823#M47771</guid>
      <dc:creator>joemama985</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-17T21:46:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Analysis of means (ANOM) decision limits for log transformed data glitch [fit curve]</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241824#M47772</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I do not see any obvious problem with either the data or the model. I would report this issue to JMP Technical Support (&lt;A href="mailto:support@jmp.com" target="_blank"&gt;support@jmp.com&lt;/A&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please report back with your findings!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 21:52:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Analysis-of-means-ANOM-decision-limits-for-log-transformed-data/m-p/241824#M47772</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-17T21:52:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

