<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: color map on correlations and estimation efficency in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237034#M46790</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you mean that the inflation caused by the correlations is severe because you expect small effects due to limited factor ranges? Is there a reason that you cannot widen the factor ranges and produce a larger effect?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 21:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-02T21:18:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>color map on correlations and estimation efficency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/236995#M46778</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am working on a design with 2 continuous factors and one discrete numeric factor and I can't go above 12 runs for this design. When I look at the color map of correlations of this design, it shows correlation among the factors. I have tried different number of runs to see it gets better but it doesn't. If I go below 12 run, power of design decreses and I can't go more than 12 runs. Is there anything I can do about the orthogonality of the design? Also, does looking at estimation efficiency help in this case?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 19:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/236995#M46778</guid>
      <dc:creator>billi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-02T19:34:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: color map on correlations and estimation efficency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237001#M46779</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is nothing wrong with using a Discrete Numeric factor. It is essemtially a continuous factor but you specify the levels and JMP specifies the terms in the model. You could also use a Continuous factor and specifiy the terms, then JMP specifies the levels. I got a better design in 12 runs this way. I saved the table here for you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Your example appeared to use a model with all main effects and two-factor interactions and a single quadriatic term for exhaust temp. That model is the one I used.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 20:20:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237001#M46779</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-02T20:20:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: color map on correlations and estimation efficency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237003#M46780</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I forgot to address your specific request for orthogonality. As you discovered, it can be very expensive to achieve this characteristic. It requires a fully balanced design and all the estimation columns must be balanced, too. We can often produce economical and effective designs without orthogonality. The 12 runs that I found seem to have a few low correlations and, therefore, a few inflated confidence interval lengths. See if the correlation is acceptable for you case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 20:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237003#M46780</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-02T20:24:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: color map on correlations and estimation efficency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237005#M46782</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5358"&gt;@Mark_Bailey&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thank you for your reponse. Using continuous factor instead of discrete numeric factor does help but I think the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;quadriatic term for exhaust temp was added when I used discrete numeric factor. Now if I only include&amp;nbsp;main effects and two-factor interactions I see correlations again. Is this expected or am I doing something different?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 20:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237005#M46782</guid>
      <dc:creator>billi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-02T20:46:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: color map on correlations and estimation efficency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237008#M46783</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Correct, as I said, if you define the levels using a Discrete Numeric factor then JMP defines the terms. You must have a quadratic term in the model to keep all three factor levels.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The reason for the non-zero correlations is the addition of a center point and the imbalance in the design. You will still have correlations if you omit the center point. Each main effect is correlated (r = +/- 1/3) with the interaction effect involving the other two factors in this case using 12 runs. You need to go to 8 runs or 16 runs to eliminate the correlations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why are you concerned about this much correlation in the estimates? Do you have high variance response to begin with? Do you have small effects of changing factor levels?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 21:01:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237008#M46783</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-02T21:01:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: color map on correlations and estimation efficency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237023#M46786</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If your expected effects are at least&amp;nbsp;3x the standard deviation of the response then the power is quite high with the 12 runs:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="power.JPG" style="width: 277px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/20499iC4AA9F97F6C76418/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="power.JPG" alt="power.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This result can be expected even with the correlations (+/- 1/3) seen here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Correlations.JPG" style="width: 418px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/20500i419E6724CA5A44C1/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Correlations.JPG" alt="Correlations.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The correlations result in NO bias of the estimates. The correlations inflate the variance of the estimates, which causes a lengthening of the confidence intervals:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="estimation efficiencu.JPG" style="width: 289px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/20501i7D56E2AE162E43FC/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="estimation efficiencu.JPG" alt="estimation efficiencu.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The CI are about 6% longer, a very modest inflation. I don't think these correlations compromise the design performance much.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 21:11:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237023#M46786</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-02T21:11:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: color map on correlations and estimation efficency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237029#M46787</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5358"&gt;@Mark_Bailey&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;I am concerned about correlation because of small changes with factor levels. But correlation is better when using continuous factor instead of discrete numeric so I guess this will work for me in this case. Thank you for explaining it. Appreciated&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 21:14:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237029#M46787</guid>
      <dc:creator>billi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-02T21:14:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: color map on correlations and estimation efficency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237034#M46790</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you mean that the inflation caused by the correlations is severe because you expect small effects due to limited factor ranges? Is there a reason that you cannot widen the factor ranges and produce a larger effect?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 21:18:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237034#M46790</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-02T21:18:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: color map on correlations and estimation efficency</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237037#M46791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That was my thought but with the design you suggested correlation between factors declined so that should be the case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 21:32:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/color-map-on-correlations-and-estimation-efficency/m-p/237037#M46791</guid>
      <dc:creator>billi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-02T21:32:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

