<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Predicted Rsquare in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Predicted-Rsquare/m-p/236223#M46607</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You should not use the R square for model selection. It always increases when you make a model more complex (e.g., add a term to the linear predictor in regression). It always decreases when you make a model less complex.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Using cross-validation, though, can make the R square more useful for model selection. You might expect that the validation R square would not increase as you over-fit the data. Specifically:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;There is no way to establish how much of a difference between the training R square and the validation R square indicates over-fitting. It is a subjective decision. One can say that the model for which the two R square estimates over-fitting the least of all the candidate models.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;There is an efficient computation of the 'leave one out' statistics using the 'hat' or 'projection' matrix.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;I would not use the change in R square to select the model. I would consider other information but mostly pay attention to a criterion such as AICc or BIC.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 16:54:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-23T16:54:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Predicted Rsquare</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Predicted-Rsquare/m-p/236140#M46592</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I wanted to use predicted Rsquare to test if my model is overfitting or not.&amp;nbsp; I am not really familiar with this, so I have a few questions regarding predicted Rsquare.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. How much smaller for the predicted Rsquare is a sign of overfitting?&amp;nbsp; If the Adjusted R-square is 0.94, and the predicted R-square is 0.84, is it okay?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. I don't fully understand how the predicted Rsquare was calcuated.&amp;nbsp; I know that it takes one data point out each time, get a regression model, and put that data point back and get a R-square. It repeated for all data points and average the obtained R-squares.&amp;nbsp; But how to get those regression models ? Does JMP use machine learning approach to obtain the model? Are those regression models different from the model I choose?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. I found that it is not always true to say that the predicted R-square will drop more if there are more factors in the model. I found that, for example, the model with 2 factors can have a lower predicted R-square than a model with 3 factors (although the third factor has a p value (much) bigger than 0.05).&amp;nbsp; In this case, should I include 2 or 3 factors in the model?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 19:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Predicted-Rsquare/m-p/236140#M46592</guid>
      <dc:creator>CYLiaw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-22T19:42:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Predicted Rsquare</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Predicted-Rsquare/m-p/236223#M46607</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You should not use the R square for model selection. It always increases when you make a model more complex (e.g., add a term to the linear predictor in regression). It always decreases when you make a model less complex.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Using cross-validation, though, can make the R square more useful for model selection. You might expect that the validation R square would not increase as you over-fit the data. Specifically:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;There is no way to establish how much of a difference between the training R square and the validation R square indicates over-fitting. It is a subjective decision. One can say that the model for which the two R square estimates over-fitting the least of all the candidate models.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;There is an efficient computation of the 'leave one out' statistics using the 'hat' or 'projection' matrix.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;I would not use the change in R square to select the model. I would consider other information but mostly pay attention to a criterion such as AICc or BIC.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 16:54:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Predicted-Rsquare/m-p/236223#M46607</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-23T16:54:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Predicted Rsquare</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Predicted-Rsquare/m-p/236225#M46609</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just to add to Mark's comments, one of the methods to determine model over specification is to use the delta between the R-square and R-square adjusted. &amp;nbsp;R-quares increase as the number of degrees of freedom in the model increase (regardless of whether those DF's are important). R-square adjusted takes into account the "importance" of the DF's in the model, so adding unimportant degrees of freedom to the model, the delta will increase (the R-square adjusted will not increase at the rate of the R-square).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 17:13:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Predicted-Rsquare/m-p/236225#M46609</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-23T17:13:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

