<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multivariate analysis vs Proportional hazard model in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multivariate-analysis-vs-Proportional-hazard-model/m-p/221530#M44216</link>
    <description>Thank you all ! Marc</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:32:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marc1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-13T17:32:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multivariate analysis vs Proportional hazard model</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multivariate-analysis-vs-Proportional-hazard-model/m-p/221218#M44154</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when we are exploring certain predictors for bad outcome (mortality), we usually run univariate, followed by multivariate models (including all univariate analysis with p &amp;lt; 0.20) with backward elimination, where we report outcomes of this final model with specific OR including CI and p values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now recently , when I explored proportional hazards models, as we do have for all patients time to event (death) or discharge home - I was suprised to see different outcomes than in my multivariate models, where I used the same variables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it generally better if you have a time to event , exploring those variables with proportional hazards than with univariate / multivariate analysis ? Do I first run better a univariate analysis and based on those identified with p &amp;lt; 0.2 (?) , which I enter into my proportional hazard model ? Or do I enter all potential variables ? Do I have to explore and exclude colinearity in proportional hazard first ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would be the advantage / disadvantage for either multivariate or proportional hazard&amp;nbsp; ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot, Marc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 19:47:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multivariate-analysis-vs-Proportional-hazard-model/m-p/221218#M44154</guid>
      <dc:creator>marc1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-09T19:47:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multivariate analysis vs Proportional hazard model</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multivariate-analysis-vs-Proportional-hazard-model/m-p/221230#M44156</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am not sure what you specifically mean by "&lt;SPAN&gt;we usually run univariate, followed by multivariate models (including all univariate analysis with p &amp;lt; 0.20) with backward elimination&lt;/SPAN&gt;" but if you mean a linear model with regression, then there are likely some important differences for your data. The main differences are (1) censored life data and (2) non-normal distributions of life data. Because of these differences, the proportional hazards model or the parametric survival model tends to give better and more realistic estimates and tests.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 20:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multivariate-analysis-vs-Proportional-hazard-model/m-p/221230#M44156</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-09T20:55:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multivariate analysis vs Proportional hazard model</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multivariate-analysis-vs-Proportional-hazard-model/m-p/221278#M44165</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Right!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:08:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multivariate-analysis-vs-Proportional-hazard-model/m-p/221278#M44165</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-12T22:08:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multivariate analysis vs Proportional hazard model</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multivariate-analysis-vs-Proportional-hazard-model/m-p/221530#M44216</link>
      <description>Thank you all ! Marc</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 17:32:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Multivariate-analysis-vs-Proportional-hazard-model/m-p/221530#M44216</guid>
      <dc:creator>marc1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-13T17:32:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

