<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic X-axis format in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/X-axis-format/m-p/215379#M43041</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;How to divide the X-axis into equal parts (SEE picture)?&lt;BR /&gt;P.S. X-axis is not interactive in the "Y by X platform"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:53:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-28T16:53:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>X-axis format</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/X-axis-format/m-p/215379#M43041</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How to divide the X-axis into equal parts (SEE picture)?&lt;BR /&gt;P.S. X-axis is not interactive in the "Y by X platform"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:53:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/X-axis-format/m-p/215379#M43041</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-28T16:53:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X-axis format</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/X-axis-format/m-p/215411#M43044</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry - I was mistaken that you could turn off the proportional spacing in the Contingency platform. (I never wanted to turn it off.) I must be thinking of Oneway, another platform under Fit Y by X.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:40:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/X-axis-format/m-p/215411#M43044</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-28T17:40:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X-axis format</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/X-axis-format/m-p/215412#M43045</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6367"&gt;@Ted&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Mosaic plots (which is the default visual you will get in Fit Y by X when you use a categorical X and categorical Y) do not divide the x-axis evenly unless there is an equal number of observations in each of the categories represented by the x-axis. &lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/14-2/mosaic-plot.shtml" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;You can see the documentation for mosaic plots here&lt;/A&gt;. There isn't a way to disable this scaling in Fit Y by X because it's a feature of the plot itself. And, it's a good thing! Because of that scaling, you can see the marginal distribution of your X-variable, which is quite useful to see in addition to the conditional distribution of Y for each X category.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you absolutely need a plot that sizes the X-axis uniformly irrespective of the distribution of X, it won't be a mosaic plot. But, you can make such a plot in Graph &amp;gt; Graph Builder, by placing your Y variable in the Y Role, and your X variable not in the X-Role, but in the Group X role at the top. Then, toggle the mosaic plot at the top to make a mosaic-like plot.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="gb.gif" style="width: 980px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/18066i43DECD658A4AB80C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="gb.gif" alt="gb.gif" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2026"&gt;@jules&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:37:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/X-axis-format/m-p/215412#M43045</guid>
      <dc:creator>jules</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-28T17:37:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X-axis format</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/X-axis-format/m-p/488329#M73183</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure if this is still an issue in the newer versions of JMP, but the problem I have is the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the X by X contingency I can't adjust the y-axis which looks lousy for low frequency issues, so I go to the graph builder to use the mosaic.&amp;nbsp; But there the X-axis can't be adjusted.&amp;nbsp; Doing the Group X binning works ok but then I lose the built in chi-sq (I can solve it in x by x and then bring it back over but that's a little clunky).&amp;nbsp; I don't really care if I do it graph builder or x by x but I need it somewhere where I can get a clean, easy to read graph to go with my chi-sq.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe just make the y-axis scalable in the normal contingency plot?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 09:10:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/X-axis-format/m-p/488329#M73183</guid>
      <dc:creator>Evan_Morris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-19T09:10:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

