<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: capability analysis using control chart builder in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/capability-analysis-using-control-chart-builder/m-p/193735#M41431</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you gzmorgan0 for the explanation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>billi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-19T13:13:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>capability analysis using control chart builder</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/capability-analysis-using-control-chart-builder/m-p/193067#M41303</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I got machine in lab for which I have set limits and I am trying to find out what is the probability of failing in the the future or if I'll get readings out of spec. First I used control chart builder and then did capability analysis and I got the following nonconformance table. Is this telling me that 2 out of 100 reading will be out of spec? What is expected within %?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Capture.PNG" style="width: 335px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/16890i19E9B6C5756A47B5/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Capture.PNG" alt="Capture.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/capability-analysis-using-control-chart-builder/m-p/193067#M41303</guid>
      <dc:creator>billi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-15T20:30:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: capability analysis using control chart builder</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/capability-analysis-using-control-chart-builder/m-p/193099#M41310</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;See the excerpt below, from the JMP Help select Scripting Index &amp;gt; Objects &amp;gt; search for nonconformance then press the Topic Help button.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Overall Sigma will be larger than Within Sigma, and % out of spec will be larger. If your data is representative of the full population and can be modeled as a normal distribution and your specified control chart subgrouping, then yes 16 out of 1000.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;JMP Help:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ww313206" class="body"&gt;The Individual Details report for a variable with a normal distribution shows a histogram, process summary details, and capability and &lt;STRONG&gt;nonconformance&lt;/STRONG&gt; statistics. The histogram shows the distribution of the values, the lower and upper specification limits and the process target (if they are specified), and one or two curves showing the assumed distribution. The histogram in&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A title="Individual Detail Reports" href="https://community.jmp.com/../jmp/QPM_Process_Capability_20.html#ww312059" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Figure&amp;nbsp;11.14&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;shows two normal curves, one based on the overall estimate of standard deviation and the other based on the within-subgroup estimate.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ww581449" class="body"&gt;When you fit your process with a normal distribution, the Process Summary includes the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="Term"&gt;Stability Index&lt;/SPAN&gt;, which is a measure of stability of the process. The stability index is defined as follows:&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ww581450" class="equation"&gt;(Overall Sigma/Within Sigma)&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="equation"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ww682603" class="body"&gt;If Calculate Between-and-Within Capability is specified for a process in the launch window, the stability index for that process is defined as follows:&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ww682876" class="equation"&gt;(Overall Sigma/Between-and-Within Sigma)&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="equation"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ww581393" class="body"&gt;A stable process has stability index near one. Higher values indicate less stability.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="body"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV id="ww706942" class="Note"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="Note"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Note:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;You can change the preferences for stability assessment type in File&amp;nbsp;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;Preferences&amp;nbsp;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;Platforms&amp;nbsp;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;Process Capability. This changes the stability assessment type used through the Process Capability platform.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 02:02:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/capability-analysis-using-control-chart-builder/m-p/193099#M41310</guid>
      <dc:creator>gzmorgan0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-16T02:02:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: capability analysis using control chart builder</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/capability-analysis-using-control-chart-builder/m-p/193735#M41431</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you gzmorgan0 for the explanation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/capability-analysis-using-control-chart-builder/m-p/193735#M41431</guid>
      <dc:creator>billi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-19T13:13:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

