<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LSMeans Tests between Student's t vs. Tukey HSD in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/LSMeans-Tests-between-Student-s-t-vs-Tukey-HSD/m-p/85127#M38125</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I would not perform any &lt;EM&gt;post hoc&lt;/EM&gt; tests until I validated the assumptions of the model and addressed all the issues with the estimation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Did you notice the warnings in the report of the variance components?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Did you notice that your model is over-specified and the fixed and random effects are confounded?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Did you notice that one of the random effects is zeroed?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;How do you justify treating gender as a random effect?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't think that this analysis is quite ready for any &lt;EM&gt;post hoc&lt;/EM&gt; tests.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 20:57:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-06T20:57:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LSMeans Tests between Student's t vs. Tukey HSD</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/LSMeans-Tests-between-Student-s-t-vs-Tukey-HSD/m-p/85126#M38124</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Has anyone seen this result where Student's t letters are the same while Tukey HSD letters are different. I usually see visa versa. Any thought?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 20:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/LSMeans-Tests-between-Student-s-t-vs-Tukey-HSD/m-p/85126#M38124</guid>
      <dc:creator>nickki_s</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-06T20:42:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LSMeans Tests between Student's t vs. Tukey HSD</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/LSMeans-Tests-between-Student-s-t-vs-Tukey-HSD/m-p/85127#M38125</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would not perform any &lt;EM&gt;post hoc&lt;/EM&gt; tests until I validated the assumptions of the model and addressed all the issues with the estimation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Did you notice the warnings in the report of the variance components?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Did you notice that your model is over-specified and the fixed and random effects are confounded?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Did you notice that one of the random effects is zeroed?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;How do you justify treating gender as a random effect?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't think that this analysis is quite ready for any &lt;EM&gt;post hoc&lt;/EM&gt; tests.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 20:57:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/LSMeans-Tests-between-Student-s-t-vs-Tukey-HSD/m-p/85127#M38125</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-06T20:57:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

