<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DOE L18 Design matrix in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/DOE-L18-Design-matrix/m-p/78540#M36446</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Ryan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the explanation but is it correct to say that even if i run the DOE with original settings, my analysis will still be valid and the main factors identified will be the significant factors?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/Tahir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:09:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tahirawan11</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-10T08:09:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DOE L18 Design matrix</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/DOE-L18-Design-matrix/m-p/78454#M36416</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am running a Screening Design of experiment to identify the key factors affecting the output variable. The DOE includes 7 factors. Out of which 6 factors&amp;nbsp;have 2 levels and 1 factor&amp;nbsp;has 3 level. JMP is suggesting the L18 Hunter design matrix. But if I review the design matrix two of the runs (15 &amp;amp; 17, 16 &amp;amp; 18 in attached picture) have the same factor settings. Can you suggest why this is the case?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/Tahir&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 12:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/DOE-L18-Design-matrix/m-p/78454#M36416</guid>
      <dc:creator>tahirawan11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-09T12:30:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOE L18 Design matrix</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/DOE-L18-Design-matrix/m-p/78512#M36436</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Tahir,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's just the way that it happens to pick the first 3-level column. In this case, Fit Model would use those 2 replicates for lack of fit.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Another option is to add an additional 3-level factor, create the design, and drop the first 3-level column, using the second instead (this design shouldn't have any replicates).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yet another choice is to bring the same factors into Custom Design, which may give you a different design structure.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ryan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 01:56:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/DOE-L18-Design-matrix/m-p/78512#M36436</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ryan_Lekivetz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-10T01:56:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOE L18 Design matrix</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/DOE-L18-Design-matrix/m-p/78540#M36446</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Ryan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the explanation but is it correct to say that even if i run the DOE with original settings, my analysis will still be valid and the main factors identified will be the significant factors?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/Tahir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:09:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/DOE-L18-Design-matrix/m-p/78540#M36446</guid>
      <dc:creator>tahirawan11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-10T08:09:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

