<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Profiler and Constraint Property in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Profiler-and-Constraint-Property/m-p/57149#M32063</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am getting different behavior in situations where I have constraints on many X's with some of these constraints acting on one Y and other constraints acting on another Y, leading to situations like this (top profiler is on Y2 only, second profiler is the Y2 row from a profiler on both Y1 and Y2). Notice that if I don't save both Y1 and Y2's prediction equations and profile them (bottom profiler), the constraints are not respected on Y2 alone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screen Shot 2018-05-17 at 12.52.43 PM.png" style="width: 984px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10763iB12AA6C2A3C2DED1/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screen Shot 2018-05-17 at 12.52.43 PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2018-05-17 at 12.52.43 PM.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 16:56:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mjoner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-17T16:56:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Profiler and Constraint Property</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Profiler-and-Constraint-Property/m-p/57146#M32061</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Background:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;I have an experiment which has a linear constraint. For example, X1 may represent a temperature set-point to which I am heating my material, and X2 may represent a cooler temperature which the material will see that allows it to cure after it was heated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For this (contrived) example a reasonable linear constraint may be X1 - X2 &amp;gt;= 0. JMP DOE makes this really easy to set.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, I run the experiment, collect the data, and fit the model. I use Stepwise (let's say AICc, although it doesn't really matter) and come to the conclusion that one of the constrained factors, say, X2, is not needed in the final model.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Problem:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;If I fit a model that does not include ALL of the columns listed in the Constraint property, JMP will give an error "There was a problem loading the constraint(s) in the JSL constraint property."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are my options here? Accept an inferior model that keeps all of the factors that are in the Constraint in the model? Delete the Constraint property (fine if I don't have other constrained variables involving X3, X4, etc.)?&amp;nbsp;Save the model equation to the data table, then edit the formula and add a term for 0*X2 (if X2 is the insignificant term) and display the model with the Profiler tool? Other options?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this a JMP bug or has JMP always functioned this way? I don't remember this being a problem in older versions of JMP - I'm on 14 now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 16:28:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Profiler-and-Constraint-Property/m-p/57146#M32061</guid>
      <dc:creator>mjoner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-17T16:28:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Profiler and Constraint Property</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Profiler-and-Constraint-Property/m-p/57147#M32062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In JMP 13, I see that warning when you try to fit the model (using Fit Model/Fit Least Squares) and one of the terms in the constraint is missing, however I can click through the warning and the model fit will still run.&amp;nbsp; I also get the same warning if I've saved the prediction formula to the data table and try to create the Profiler of the prediction equation, but again, I can click through and the profiler runs ok.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 16:42:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Profiler-and-Constraint-Property/m-p/57147#M32062</guid>
      <dc:creator>MathStatChem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-17T16:42:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Profiler and Constraint Property</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Profiler-and-Constraint-Property/m-p/57149#M32063</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am getting different behavior in situations where I have constraints on many X's with some of these constraints acting on one Y and other constraints acting on another Y, leading to situations like this (top profiler is on Y2 only, second profiler is the Y2 row from a profiler on both Y1 and Y2). Notice that if I don't save both Y1 and Y2's prediction equations and profile them (bottom profiler), the constraints are not respected on Y2 alone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screen Shot 2018-05-17 at 12.52.43 PM.png" style="width: 984px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10763iB12AA6C2A3C2DED1/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screen Shot 2018-05-17 at 12.52.43 PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2018-05-17 at 12.52.43 PM.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 16:56:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Profiler-and-Constraint-Property/m-p/57149#M32063</guid>
      <dc:creator>mjoner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-17T16:56:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

