<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Response surface mesh and 3D contour plot in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/56512#M31750</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You will find a lot of information about the JMP versions by selecting &lt;STRONG&gt;Help&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Books&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Profilers&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I should add that these profilers are available in most fitting platforms and separately as their own stand alone platform. In the latter case, they use a column formula. You can save fitted models as a&amp;nbsp;column formula.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 16:55:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-07T16:55:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Response surface mesh and 3D contour plot</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/56510#M31749</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does anybody know, if it is possible to create a Response surface mesh and 3D contoour plot in JMP. If it is, how can I do that? I added two pictures, to better ilustrate what I have in mind.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Response surface mesh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8xguWwLQhpQ/maxresdefault.jpg" border="0" alt="Rezultat iskanja slik za response surface mesh plot jmp" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3D contour plot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5y5MviGOy1o/maxresdefault.jpg" border="0" alt="Rezultat iskanja slik za response surface mesh plot jmp" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any better way to present&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;a response which is dependent on three factors &lt;STRONG&gt;in one plot&lt;/STRONG&gt;? I first presented the relation with 9 surface plots (3 for every combination of 2 factors, the third factor has always a different value (-1,0,1)), which is a very clear presentation in my opinion but it takes a lot of space and can hide the general picture because it is too segmented. I was also thinking about cube plot, but it hides a lot of information, especially, because I have one quadratic effect...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Danijel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 18:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/56510#M31749</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danijel_V</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-07T18:17:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Response surface mesh and 3D contour plot</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/56512#M31750</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You will find a lot of information about the JMP versions by selecting &lt;STRONG&gt;Help&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Books&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Profilers&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I should add that these profilers are available in most fitting platforms and separately as their own stand alone platform. In the latter case, they use a column formula. You can save fitted models as a&amp;nbsp;column formula.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 16:55:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/56512#M31750</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-07T16:55:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Response surface mesh and 3D contour plot</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/56515#M31753</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have attached an example script of the JMP 3D profiler with Mesh.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JMP has a 3D scatterplot and a Surface Profiler.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is not too difficult with a little scripting to create a 9 plot view, or use Graph Builder: use 2 factors one for X and one for Y, making sure the one with the quadratic effect is included, then create if the other 2 factors can have discrete values like -1, 0 and 1, use one factor for X grouping and another for Y grouping then color by the modeled strength. Then instead of points use a contour.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another possibility is to create "pictures" of the 3D plots the multiple levels of the remaining factors. and store then in a table. JMP 14 allows pictures to be used as the graphic icons, so you could create a grid of 3D views.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your model has a secondary relationship, where the model can be reparameterized (for example maybe a combination of sealing and cooling temperature), you might be able to use it to reduce the dimensionality. However, from my experience, these are more difficult to visualize.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 17:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/56515#M31753</guid>
      <dc:creator>gzmorgan0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-07T17:38:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Response surface mesh and 3D contour plot</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/56516#M31754</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Oh, when I have a function that has many factors, I like parallel plots. Some say it is an "acquired taste."&amp;nbsp; For your example, I think the multi-view (as I explained above) would be more informative for most.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 18:00:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/56516#M31754</guid>
      <dc:creator>gzmorgan0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-07T18:00:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Response surface mesh and 3D contour plot</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/56562#M31788</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for elaborate answer. I think I will stay with 9 response surface graphs.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I still didn't get the answer for my first question though. I already know the 3D profiler, but I actualy want to make it 4D. I want that values of factors to determine the location of points (like 3D coordinates) and that I then colour the points, where the colour of the points represents the response (for example red for high values, blue for low). Than I would do a contour instead of points. Is there any way to colout the points in the way I described?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 15:51:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/56562#M31788</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danijel_V</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-08T15:51:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Response surface mesh and 3D contour plot</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/313843#M56608</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you end up getting an answer for this? I'm in the same boat trying to make the graphic 4D to represent a color contour.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:42:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/313843#M56608</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeDereviankin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-28T13:42:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Response surface mesh and 3D contour plot</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/313933#M56610</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;unfortunately no, however, when you think about it there is a reason that JMP or other statistical softwares doesn't offer possibility to create 4D plot, since it is a very unclear presentation. My advice would be to stick to 2D charts when possible, since we are ussually presenting charts on 2D surface, when neccessary use 3D.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:28:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Response-surface-mesh-and-3D-contour-plot/m-p/313933#M56610</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danijel_V</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-28T14:28:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

