<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Students T post HOC test in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Students-T-post-HOC-test/m-p/56084#M31480</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe this correction may be to conservative though, in one case I am correcting for 126 comparisons.&amp;nbsp; Is there a better correction method I can use for multiple comparisons?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:49:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alec1293</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-29T21:49:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Students T post HOC test</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Students-T-post-HOC-test/m-p/56082#M31478</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am running a mixed model in JMP, there is a three way interaction I am interested in the outcome of, which is the interaction: Location * Date * Treatment. I am looking for differences between locations and treatments on each date but unfortunately I cannot use Test Slices because there are 6 comparison within each day I am interested in.&amp;nbsp; So what I have to do is use the LSmeans Students T which gives every possible comparison (nearly 400) but I am only interested in what happens within each day (6 each day, 7 days = 42 comparisons) and maybe what happens from one day to the next but not the first day vs. last day.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using a bonferroni correction to correct for the multiple comparisons by doing alpha(0.05)/ k (# of comparisons being considered), this provides a corrected p-value for the multiple comparisons.&amp;nbsp; Which I know protects agains type I error but adds vulnerability to type II error possibility. Is this the best way to go about this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for any help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2018 15:58:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Students-T-post-HOC-test/m-p/56082#M31478</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alec1293</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-29T15:58:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Students T post HOC test</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Students-T-post-HOC-test/m-p/56084#M31480</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe this correction may be to conservative though, in one case I am correcting for 126 comparisons.&amp;nbsp; Is there a better correction method I can use for multiple comparisons?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2018 21:49:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Students-T-post-HOC-test/m-p/56084#M31480</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alec1293</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-29T21:49:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

