<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Percent distribution vs percent frequency occurrence in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Percent-distribution-vs-percent-frequency-occurrence/m-p/55588#M31412</link>
    <description>Dan Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks for the clear explanation. You are right.&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:18:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alma1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-26T20:18:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Percent distribution vs percent frequency occurrence</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Percent-distribution-vs-percent-frequency-occurrence/m-p/55354#M31315</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have distribution graph from jmp with count and percent as encloed. In jmp although the count number is there jmp reads it zero. Therefore, there is a difference between&amp;nbsp; calculated % why is this happening?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Picture1.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10610iD2D62B8E91D8219E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Picture1.png" alt="Picture1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Picture2.png" style="width: 883px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10608i462C6BFA608A48FC/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Picture2.png" alt="Picture2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="Picture3.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10609i53DA2FB3BE4C3E43/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Picture3.png" alt="Picture3.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 15:39:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Percent-distribution-vs-percent-frequency-occurrence/m-p/55354#M31315</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alma1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-02T15:39:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Percent distribution vs percent frequency occurrence</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Percent-distribution-vs-percent-frequency-occurrence/m-p/55356#M31317</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The JMP display is showing only whole % values....no decimal values.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;That is, the percents are rounded off to the percent value.&amp;nbsp; Thus, when a percent value is &amp;lt; .5% it is displayed as 0%.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 04:48:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Percent-distribution-vs-percent-frequency-occurrence/m-p/55356#M31317</guid>
      <dc:creator>txnelson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-23T04:48:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Percent distribution vs percent frequency occurrence</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Percent-distribution-vs-percent-frequency-occurrence/m-p/55462#M31364</link>
      <description>Hi Jim&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for your reply but if this is the case why the peak for percent graph is 7% and for count 11%?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 02:10:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Percent-distribution-vs-percent-frequency-occurrence/m-p/55462#M31364</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alma1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-25T02:10:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Percent distribution vs percent frequency occurrence</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Percent-distribution-vs-percent-frequency-occurrence/m-p/55474#M31376</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I must be missing something. In your document, the circled bar is from 1.0 to 1.1 and has a total of 11%.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the last picture, the JMP graph as a bar from 1.0 to 1.05 with a height of 5% and another bar from 1.05 to 1.1 with a height of 6%. 5% + 6% = 11%. As for the counts, they appear to be 5005+ 5640 = 10645/98968 = 10.756%. That matches with the rounding that Jim described.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The difference that I see is that in one graph you have bars taking a width of 0.1, while in the other the bar width is 0.05.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:20:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Percent-distribution-vs-percent-frequency-occurrence/m-p/55474#M31376</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dan_Obermiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-25T12:20:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Percent distribution vs percent frequency occurrence</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Percent-distribution-vs-percent-frequency-occurrence/m-p/55588#M31412</link>
      <description>Dan Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks for the clear explanation. You are right.&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:18:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Percent-distribution-vs-percent-frequency-occurrence/m-p/55588#M31412</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alma1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-26T20:18:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

