<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Preparing a Factor Analysis,principal components extraction with varimax rotation in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Preparing-a-Factor-Analysis-principal-components-extraction-with/m-p/55125#M31166</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Take a look at the Cumulative Percent Column.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The idea is that you want to use the smallest number of components to explain the largest amount of variation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this case the first two components/factors explain about 68% of the variation. If you want more, you have to add more, but each sucessive step doesn't explain much more.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:43:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Byron_JMP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-16T20:43:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Preparing a Factor Analysis,principal components extraction with varimax rotation</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Preparing-a-Factor-Analysis-principal-components-extraction-with/m-p/54970#M31071</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone, I've been looking at the expertly crafted discussions to learn some basic JMP for my course.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Absolutely full of great information!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, I'm really stumped at this seemingly easy questions.. Hoping you guys could point me at the right direction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How do I evaluate the appropriateness of using factor analysis by Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For the Factor Analysis to be appropriate, the first test has to be significant correct?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I.E The first test has a ChiSquare of 1453.32, does that make it significant?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Factor Analysis.PNG" style="width: 640px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10361iC7938E3D8287A776/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Factor Analysis.PNG" alt="Factor Analysis.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Following that, to compare the number of factors to be extracted based&amp;nbsp;on Eigenvalues, Cumulative Percentage and Scree Plot, I know I need to retain and interpet any component with an eigenvalue greater than 1.00.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I'm not sure what I'm supposed to look for in the Cumulative Percentage &amp;amp; Scree plot component.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Scree Plot.PNG" style="width: 404px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10362iDCA03F31310FD78C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Scree Plot.PNG" alt="Scree Plot.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please guide the newbie if you can, thank you so much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 09:03:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Preparing-a-Factor-Analysis-principal-components-extraction-with/m-p/54970#M31071</guid>
      <dc:creator>SunnyPrune92</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-13T09:03:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Preparing a Factor Analysis,principal components extraction with varimax rotation</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Preparing-a-Factor-Analysis-principal-components-extraction-with/m-p/55125#M31166</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Take a look at the Cumulative Percent Column.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The idea is that you want to use the smallest number of components to explain the largest amount of variation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this case the first two components/factors explain about 68% of the variation. If you want more, you have to add more, but each sucessive step doesn't explain much more.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:43:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Preparing-a-Factor-Analysis-principal-components-extraction-with/m-p/55125#M31166</guid>
      <dc:creator>Byron_JMP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-16T20:43:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

